ÎÞÓǶÌÊÓƵ

ÎÞÓǶÌÊÓƵ logo
Search Toggle menu

2021 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament

Date: Saturday, April 10, 2021

Division I Pool M

Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.

TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
Columbia A3–0100.0%890607 26 716.97296.67
Illinois A2–166.7%885609 24 1016.97295.00
Stanford1–233.3%840609 19 719.64280.00
Texas A0–30.0%620603 21 315.83206.67

Pool N

TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
Florida A3–0100.0%900607 24 318.39300.00
Chicago A2–166.7%895609 21 619.33298.33
Harvard A1–233.3%705604 21 518.40235.00
Ohio State0–30.0%725603 24 417.04241.67

Pool O

TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
UC Berkeley A3–0100.0%995604 30 519.41331.67
Yale2–166.7%760603 25 1118.57253.33
Maryland A1–233.3%675602 27 914.48225.00
Brown0–30.0%520604 18 614.09173.33

Pool P

TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
Cambridge3–0100.0%1000605 32 316.76333.33
Princeton2–166.7%680603 25 314.29226.67
Georgia Tech A1–233.3%650602 24 816.15216.67
MIT A0–30.0%485604 16 915.50161.67

Pool Q

TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
Columbia B2–166.7%645602 27 913.45215.00
Northwestern A2–166.7%625602 26 1113.93208.33
WUSTL A1–233.3%620605 20 1116.00206.67
Penn State1–233.3%465603 17 213.00155.00

Pool R

TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
WUSTL B2–166.7%560602 24 411.92186.67
Chicago B2–166.7%525602 21 713.91175.00
Texas B1–233.3%510602 23 1012.00170.00
Harvard B1–233.3%400601 18 512.11133.33

Pool S

TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
UC Davis2–166.7%745606 27 512.42248.33
Indiana2–166.7%525604 17 314.76175.00
Rutgers A1–233.3%640604 21 616.00213.33
Michigan A1–233.3%365601 18 610.53121.67

Pool T

TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
Illinois B3–0100.0%665601 27 213.93221.67
Minnesota A2–166.7%610601 27 712.86203.33
Oregon1–233.3%425603 18 610.95141.67
Florida B0–30.0%330600 18 49.44110.00

Division II Pool MM

Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.

TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
Vanderbilt3–0100.0%900606 24 820.33300.00
Minnesota B2–166.7%905607 25 818.44301.67
British Columbia1–233.3%670606 19 817.20223.33
UC Berkeley B0–30.0%525603 20 813.91175.00

Pool NN

TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
Columbia C2–166.7%915602 27 722.41305.00
South Carolina A2–166.7%795604 24 318.21265.00
Kentucky1–233.3%750603 25 517.78250.00
Illinois C1–233.3%620606 18 1417.50206.67

Pool OO

TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
Northwestern B2–166.7%840603 27 518.33280.00
MIT B2–166.7%815604 25 718.62271.67
Chicago C1–233.3%735606 21 517.04245.00
Maryland B1–233.3%610603 23 513.85203.33

Pool PP

TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
Rutgers B3–0100.0%770607 24 915.16256.67
Florida C2–166.7%785603 31 413.24261.67
Northern Michigan1–233.3%610601 26 312.96203.33
Tufts0–30.0%425601 17 615.00141.67

Pool QQ

TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
Georgia Tech B3–0100.0%780602 25 419.26260.00
Iowa2–166.7%675604 27 311.61225.00
Harvard C1–233.3%595606 18 915.42198.33
Amherst0–30.0%420602 17 412.63140.00

Pool RR

TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
WUSTL C3–0100.0%660601 27 113.57220.00
James Madison2–166.7%585601 25 212.69195.00
Michigan B1–233.3%595602 25 913.33198.33
South Carolina B0–30.0%450600 22 1012.73150.00

Pool SS

TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
SUNY-Stony Brook2–166.7%565601 26 611.85188.33
Jefferson CC2–166.7%535600 27 310.37178.33
Case Western1–233.3%320401 13 112.86160.00
Cleveland State1–233.3%100400 8 45.0050.00

Pool TT

TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
Liberty2–0100.0%185200 9 312.22185.00
Boise State1–150.0%130201 7 16.25130.00
Santa Fe0–20.0%105400 9 12.2252.50

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read