If you played in this Buzzword competition and want to see your personal results, you will need to log in.
Season results are based on each player’s five best games (out of eight).
#
Awards
Player
Region
Grade
Games
TUH
# Correct
% Correct
Average Correct Celerity
Score
1
Eric Wolfsberg
California
Grad.
5
250
234
93.6%
.385
3,396
2
Itamar Naveh-Benjamin
Virginia
Grad.
5
250
222
88.8%
.448
3,392
3
Alexander Pyle
New York
So.
5
250
228
91.2%
.380
3,293
4
Sharath Narayan
Tennessee
Jr.
5
250
231
92.4%
.341
3,223
5
Trevor Davis
Canada
Grad.
5
250
234
93.6%
.299
3,154
6
Alex Schmidt
Pennsylvania
So.
5
250
228
91.2%
.318
3,115
7
Eric Li
Massachusetts
Sr.
5
250
216
86.4%
.375
3,113
8
Daniel Hothem
Oregon
Grad.
5
250
225
90.0%
.292
3,017
9
Nick Jensen
California
Grad.
5
250
211
84.4%
.358
3,000
10
Natan Holtzman
California
Grad.
5
250
209
83.6%
.365
2,990
11
Eric Bobrow
Maryland
Grad.
5
250
224
89.6%
.284
2,960
12
Ashwath Seetharaman
Texas
Jr.
5
250
209
83.6%
.342
2,922
13
Michael Coates
California
Grad.
5
250
221
88.4%
.278
2,922
14
Christopher Sims
Illinois
Grad.
5
250
222
88.8%
.265
2,891
15
Thomas Gioia
Massachusetts
Jr.
5
250
207
82.8%
.321
2,840
16
Vikshar Athreya
Washington
Jr.
5
250
212
84.8%
.268
2,769
17
Swapnil Garg
Massachusetts
Jr.
5
250
208
83.2%
.277
2,746
18
Jack Van Nostrand
Canada
5th-Yr. Sr.
5
250
196
78.4%
.309
2,662
19
Jonathan Caldwell
Tennessee
Jr.
5
250
216
86.4%
.204
2,640
20
Connor Mayers
Maryland
Fr.
5
250
209
83.6%
.235
2,639
21
Vishal Puppala
Missouri
5th-Yr. Sr.
5
250
192
76.8%
.308
2,600
22
Matt Mitchell
Connecticut
Grad.
5
250
202
80.8%
.243
2,564
23
Leah Honsinger
Florida
Grad.
5
250
208
83.2%
.205
2,563
24
Jay Mikel Misuk
Canada
Grad.
5
250
194
77.6%
.283
2,562
25
Junu Song
California
Fr.
5
250
210
84.0%
.194
2,550
26
Adrian Wong
Canada
So.
5
250
205
82.0%
.206
2,524
27
Michael Bukata
Illinois
Grad.
5
250
206
82.4%
.191
2,491
28
Paul Lee
Missouri
Grad.
5
250
202
80.8%
.206
2,488
29
James Rowan
California
Grad.
5
250
193
77.2%
.249
2,477
30
Austin L. Smith
Kentucky
Grad.
5
250
202
80.8%
.207
2,473
31
Jeremy Tsai
Maryland
Grad.
5
250
188
75.2%
.251
2,421
32
Mazin Omer
Massachusetts
So.
5
250
180
72.0%
.299
2,413
33
Chauncey Lo
New York
Jr.
5
250
202
80.8%
.168
2,372
34
Kane Nguyen
Canada
Sr.
5
250
201
80.4%
.167
2,368
35
Casey Stafford
Illinois
So.
5
250
194
77.6%
.198
2,366
36
Jake Sundberg
Louisiana
Grad.
5
250
198
79.2%
.181
2,363
37
Venu Reddy
Louisiana
Sr.
5
250
191
76.4%
.206
2,356
38
Eric Rosenthal
New York
Grad.
5
250
172
68.8%
.300
2,305
39
Tomás Aguilar-Fraga
California
So.
5
250
188
75.2%
.205
2,302
40
Darren Petrosino
New Jersey
So.
5
250
182
72.8%
.226
2,285
41
John Marvin Sipp
Illinois
Grad.
5
250
177
70.8%
.254
2,283
42
Michael Ponce
Tennessee
Sr.
5
250
184
73.6%
.201
2,254
43
Akshay Subramaniam
Washington
Grad.
5
250
183
73.2%
.179
2,194
44
Matt D'Annunzio
Connecticut
Fr.
5
250
185
74.0%
.168
2,174
45
Sarah Benner
Indiana
Sr.
5
250
173
69.2%
.197
2,088
46
Lalit Maharjan
Indiana
Sr.
5
250
158
63.2%
.203
1,950
47
Matthew Hoffer-Hawlik
Virginia
Grad.
5
250
152
60.8%
.252
1,941
48
Erie Mitchell
North Carolina
Fr.
5
250
165
66.0%
.124
1,848
49
Di Xiao
Canada
Grad.
5
250
156
62.4%
.133
1,785
50
David Gunderman
Colorado
Grad.
5
250
143
57.2%
.106
1,588
51
Chris Given
Louisiana
Sr.
5
250
138
55.2%
.141
1,585
52
Emmett Laurie
New Jersey
5th-Yr. Sr.
3
150
111
74.0%
.324
1,531
53
Seoan Webb
United Kingdom
So.
2
100
87
87.0%
.256
1,126
54
Andrew Morin
District of Columbia
Fr.
2
100
68
68.0%
.297
913
55
Andrew Hanna
Tennessee
So.
2
100
61
61.0%
.292
817
56
Pranav Veluri
Indiana
So.
2
100
58
58.0%
.221
719
57
Alexander Koutsoukos
California
Fr.
1
50
45
90.0%
.278
596
58
Isaiah Gutman
Iowa
So.
1
50
40
80.0%
.191
483
59
David Arena
Massachusetts
Fr.
1
50
34
68.0%
.200
414
60
Chandler West
Tennessee
Grad.
1
50
35
70.0%
.166
410
61
Ben Russell Jones
United Kingdom
So.
1
50
35
70.0%
.138
401
62
Sean Jackson
South Carolina
Sr.
1
50
34
68.0%
.173
400
63
Justin Chen
Indiana
Jr.
1
50
28
56.0%
.105
310
64
Joao de Mendonca Salim
Florida
So.
1
50
20
40.0%
.148
232
Celerity is the fraction of the question that had not been read at the time of a buzz (for which a correct answer was provided). 1.000 is an immediate buzz, .500 is an answer given halfway through the question in terms of time on the sound recording, and .000 is an answer given at the very end.