If you played in this Buzzword competition and want to see your personal results, you will need to log in.
Season results are based on each player’s five best games (out of eight).
#
Awards
Player
Region
Games
TUH
# Correct
% Correct
Average Correct Celerity
Score
1
Matthew Jackson
District of Columbia
5
250
244
97.6%
.399
3,580
2
Neil Gurram
California
5
250
232
92.8%
.449
3,554
3
Mike Sorice
Illinois
5
250
239
95.6%
.394
3,495
4
Dylan Minarik
Wisconsin
5
250
239
95.6%
.395
3,489
5
Matthew Bollinger
Virginia
5
250
223
89.2%
.426
3,352
6
Stephen Liu
California
5
250
221
88.4%
.424
3,313
7
Jordan Brownstein
Virginia
5
250
215
86.0%
.448
3,296
8
Kenji Shimizu
Michigan
5
250
225
90.0%
.390
3,280
9
Benji Nguyen
Texas
5
250
223
89.2%
.364
3,181
10
Ryan Rosenberg
California
5
250
219
87.6%
.364
3,116
11
Ankit Aggarwal
California
5
250
216
86.4%
.373
3,104
12
Jeff King
Maryland
5
250
236
94.4%
.273
3,089
13
Hidehiro Anto
California
5
250
236
94.4%
.269
3,085
14
Andrew Ullsperger
Illinois
5
250
238
95.2%
.260
3,081
15
Kevin Wang
Massachusetts
5
250
207
82.8%
.404
3,058
16
Greg Peterson
Illinois
5
250
219
87.6%
.341
3,057
17
Jonathan Suh
Illinois
5
250
224
89.6%
.307
3,041
18
Michael Laudermith
Illinois
5
250
229
91.6%
.284
3,025
19
Chris Borglum
Florida
5
250
222
88.8%
.312
3,020
20
Arthur Walden Lechner
North Carolina
5
250
230
92.0%
.269
3,007
21
Joey Goldman
United Kingdom
5
250
203
81.2%
.400
2,992
22
Aidan Mehigan
New Jersey
5
250
212
84.8%
.348
2,987
23
Andrew Wang
Illinois
5
250
206
82.4%
.375
2,973
24
Alan Lin
California
5
250
225
90.0%
.279
2,962
25
Evan Nagler
New York
5
250
229
91.6%
.253
2,953
26
Scott Latchem
California
5
250
222
88.8%
.279
2,945
27
Gerry Tansey
Missouri
5
250
224
89.6%
.264
2,920
28
Iain Thoms
United Kingdom
5
250
215
86.0%
.300
2,903
29
Chris Romero
Texas
5
250
225
90.0%
.252
2,895
30
Janice Paton
Massachusetts
5
250
227
90.8%
.227
2,845
31
JinAh Kim
Virginia
5
250
212
84.8%
.296
2,837
32
Chris White
New York
5
250
223
89.2%
.240
2,834
33
Michael Bentley
Washington
5
250
214
85.6%
.276
2,829
34
Jason Hess
Texas
5
250
217
86.8%
.265
2,824
35
Aaron Dos Remedios
Canada
5
250
212
84.8%
.275
2,797
36
Sean Smiley
Virginia
5
250
213
85.2%
.270
2,797
37
Chris Ottolino
Missouri
5
250
214
85.6%
.259
2,761
38
Christopher Gismondi
Michigan
5
250
208
83.2%
.288
2,760
39
Ian Dewan
Europe
5
250
201
80.4%
.319
2,750
40
Adam Escandell
Texas
5
250
206
82.4%
.287
2,740
41
Dan Puma
Illinois
5
250
212
84.8%
.258
2,736
42
Eric Douglass
South Carolina
5
250
213
85.2%
.250
2,736
43
Tony Chen
Canada
5
250
213
85.2%
.243
2,725
44
Jason Keller
New Jersey
5
250
224
89.6%
.198
2,725
45
Sam Rombro
Florida
5
250
214
85.6%
.243
2,719
46
Michael Olson
Minnesota
5
250
212
84.8%
.231
2,675
47
Ben Chametzky
Illinois
5
250
197
78.8%
.305
2,669
48
James E. Lasker
Texas
5
250
205
82.0%
.264
2,659
49
Victor Pavao
Massachusetts
5
250
200
80.0%
.286
2,652
50
Dargan Ware
Alabama
5
250
205
82.0%
.253
2,630
51
Brian Weikle
Minnesota
5
250
212
84.8%
.221
2,628
52
Dan Passner
New Jersey
5
250
197
78.8%
.282
2,613
53
Innis Carson
United Kingdom
5
250
217
86.8%
.181
2,591
54
Shane Whitlock
Arkansas
5
250
198
79.2%
.270
2,588
55
Arthur Lee
Texas
5
250
207
82.8%
.209
2,551
56
Matthew Marcus
California
5
250
208
83.2%
.204
2,551
57
Wesley Mathews
Arizona
5
250
194
77.6%
.267
2,531
58
John Hanna
North Carolina
5
250
199
79.6%
.236
2,526
59
Steve Bahnaman
North Carolina
5
250
191
76.4%
.256
2,452
60
Jimmy Li
California
5
250
199
79.6%
.205
2,438
61
Halle Friedman
Illinois
5
250
198
79.2%
.202
2,435
62
Aaron Lichtig
Maryland
5
250
201
80.4%
.187
2,422
63
Jean Cui
New York
5
250
192
76.8%
.225
2,403
64
Max Espensen
United Kingdom
5
250
197
78.8%
.198
2,401
65
Julie Bratvold
California
5
250
194
77.6%
.211
2,397
66
Sam Matson
Tennessee
5
250
197
78.8%
.188
2,376
67
Tamara Vardomskaya
Canada
5
250
189
75.6%
.228
2,372
68
Parikshit Chauhan
Washington
5
250
192
76.8%
.202
2,350
69
Patrick Liao
Canada
5
250
178
71.2%
.274
2,342
70
Alan Huang
Massachusetts
5
250
190
76.0%
.201
2,335
71
Moses Mwesigwa Kitakule
Maryland
5
250
177
70.8%
.274
2,324
72
Joshua Levit
Massachusetts
5
250
192
76.8%
.194
2,323
73
Toby Cox
United Kingdom
5
250
177
70.8%
.266
2,305
74
Josh Hill
Arkansas
5
250
192
76.8%
.174
2,287
75
Carl Tjo
California
5
250
175
70.0%
.262
2,282
76
Randall Eng
New York
5
250
180
72.0%
.227
2,267
77
Deb Wells
Pennsylvania
5
250
188
75.2%
.185
2,252
78
Patrick Carthy
Europe
5
250
181
72.4%
.218
2,246
79
Paul Smith
North Carolina
5
250
189
75.6%
.162
2,238
80
Ben Ingram
South Carolina
5
250
175
70.0%
.247
2,236
81
Benjamin Livingston
Minnesota
5
250
181
72.4%
.196
2,209
82
Daniel Feitel
District of Columbia
5
250
171
68.4%
.255
2,202
83
Joshua Grischow
Ohio
5
250
180
72.0%
.195
2,198
84
Sam Ferguson
North Carolina
5
250
176
70.4%
.214
2,179
85
Lucas Chang
California
5
250
175
70.0%
.217
2,176
86
Aaron Flicker
Ohio
5
250
165
66.0%
.273
2,170
87
Kaberi Chakrabarty
Illinois
5
250
190
76.0%
.110
2,121
88
Carl Voss
Minnesota
5
250
174
69.6%
.190
2,110
89
Andrew Fisher
United Kingdom
5
250
162
64.8%
.266
2,105
90
Henry Baer
California
5
225
164
72.9%
.243
2,098
91
John Kocsis
District of Columbia
5
250
178
71.2%
.166
2,088
92
Daniel Galitsky
District of Columbia
5
250
172
68.8%
.189
2,083
93
Guan Tong Tay
Asia
5
250
181
72.4%
.133
2,064
94
John Presloid
Ohio
5
250
175
70.0%
.163
2,063
95
Nic Mortimer
United Kingdom
5
250
177
70.8%
.146
2,053
96
Matthew Grieco
New York
5
250
160
64.0%
.235
2,031
97
Garrett Johnston
Alabama
5
250
160
64.0%
.232
2,019
98
Daniel DeFelippis
New York
5
250
172
68.8%
.123
1,952
99
Nancy Hirsch
Georgia
5
250
167
66.8%
.156
1,942
100
Ryan Hemmel
California
5
250
159
63.6%
.195
1,925
101
Alex Li
Wisconsin
5
250
141
56.4%
.285
1,867
102
Andrew Almas
Canada
5
250
164
65.6%
.129
1,867
103
Kyle Kahan
California
5
250
157
62.8%
.169
1,863
104
Aayush Rajasekaran
Canada
4
167
131
78.4%
.361
1,861
105
John Stewart
Virginia
5
250
153
61.2%
.149
1,787
106
Stuart Ryan Teso-Warner
Illinois
4
200
156
78.0%
.127
1,767
107
Chuck Yu
Maryland
5
250
140
56.0%
.216
1,738
108
Sameen Belal
New York
4
178
129
72.5%
.230
1,623
109
James Carberry
Louisiana
5
250
136
54.4%
.150
1,587
110
Do-Hyoung Park
Minnesota
4
200
124
62.0%
.176
1,475
111
Mindy Wong
New York
5
250
127
50.8%
.144
1,469
112
John Van Maris
Europe
5
250
128
51.2%
.127
1,462
113
Spencer Biske
Illinois
5
250
135
54.0%
.075
1,460
114
Lee Henry
Alabama
3
150
116
77.3%
.232
1,454
115
Phil Castagna
Pennsylvania
4
200
117
58.5%
.155
1,370
116
Jenna Hull
California
5
250
115
46.0%
.129
1,313
117
Brian Morehouse
Connecticut
5
250
115
46.0%
.117
1,301
118
Jamie Hodari
New York
4
151
95
62.9%
.227
1,193
119
Peter Schmidt
Pennsylvania
3
150
91
60.7%
.247
1,165
120
Mirza Ahmed
Connecticut
3
150
98
65.3%
.163
1,155
121
Dana Thurmond
Florida
3
150
88
58.7%
.190
1,064
122
Jesse Tow
Tennessee
3
150
79
52.7%
.263
1,032
123
Brad Williams
Wisconsin
3
139
79
56.8%
.195
957
124
Peter Smith
Europe
5
250
87
34.8%
.092
952
125
Tevin Li
Massachusetts
2
100
70
70.0%
.166
830
126
Shuying Zheng
Canada
5
250
70
28.0%
.158
823
127
Sam Peterson
Massachusetts
2
100
70
70.0%
.130
795
128
Robert Diethrich
Texas
2
100
53
53.0%
.277
698
129
Anthony Peek
Louisiana
2
100
55
55.0%
.216
684
130
Jason Palmer
Ohio
2
100
55
55.0%
.203
676
131
Bailey Angle
Virginia
2
100
51
51.0%
.182
613
132
Shannon Jamison
Virginia
3
150
53
35.3%
.140
613
133
Richard Yu
New York
1
50
42
84.0%
.370
605
134
Vincenzo Tagle
Asia
3
88
48
54.5%
.167
569
135
Rebecca Thomas
Georgia
2
100
45
45.0%
.147
520
136
Natalie Papillion
New York
2
67
39
58.2%
.189
474
137
Ethan Levine
Illinois
1
50
36
72.0%
.161
426
138
Stephen Ours
Virginia
1
50
32
64.0%
.187
385
139
Christopher Clough
United Kingdom
1
50
24
48.0%
.176
283
140
Lauren Cusitello
California
1
50
25
50.0%
.054
264
141
Pranav Rupireddy
Illinois
1
50
20
40.0%
.189
244
142
Denise Woodside
Missouri
1
50
16
32.0%
.085
175
143
James Raubenheimer
Pennsylvania
1
50
12
24.0%
.058
127
144
Lucy Reynolds
United Kingdom
1
19
10
52.6%
.154
118
145
Kremlin Gil
New York
1
5
3
60.0%
.058
32
146
Angela Melcher
North Carolina
3
150
0
0.0%
NaN
0
Celerity is the fraction of the question that had not been read at the time of a buzz (for which a correct answer was provided). 1.000 is an immediate buzz, .500 is an answer given halfway through the question in terms of time on the sound recording, and .000 is an answer given at the very end.