If you played in this Buzzword competition and want to see your personal results, you will need to log in.
Season results are based on each player’s five best games (out of eight).
#
Awards
Player
Region
Grade
Games
TUH
# Correct
% Correct
Average Correct Celerity
Score
1
Benjamin Kitchen
Massachusetts
Sr.
5
250
232
92.8%
.410
3,447
2
Jack Wolverton
Missouri
Jr.
5
250
235
94.0%
.311
3,195
3
Jack Drummond
Illinois
Sr.
5
250
222
88.8%
.359
3,161
4
Jack Van Nostrand
Canada
5th-Yr. Sr.
5
250
213
85.2%
.393
3,116
5
Harley Andrew
Florida
5th-Yr. Sr.
5
250
214
85.6%
.386
3,102
6
Logan Anbinder
Maryland
Grad.
5
250
221
88.4%
.331
3,073
7
Simon Sweeney
Pennsylvania
So.
5
250
225
90.0%
.301
3,038
8
Sean Doyle
Pennsylvania
So.
5
250
222
88.8%
.316
3,036
9
Collin Ace
New Jersey
So.
5
250
226
90.4%
.296
3,030
10
Trevor Davis
Canada
Grad.
5
250
223
89.2%
.309
3,027
11
Tomás Aguilar-Fraga
California
So.
5
250
223
89.2%
.306
3,013
12
Ellis Zehnder
Massachusetts
So.
5
250
208
83.2%
.339
2,902
13
Connor Hibbard
New York
So.
5
250
222
88.8%
.272
2,901
14
Erie Mitchell
North Carolina
Fr.
5
250
213
85.2%
.302
2,871
15
Lilly Chin
Massachusetts
Grad.
5
250
209
83.6%
.298
2,816
16
Jeremy Tsai
Maryland
Grad.
5
250
216
86.4%
.260
2,810
17
Michael Coates
California
Grad.
5
250
208
83.2%
.283
2,765
18
John Petrovich
Indiana
Sr.
5
250
215
86.0%
.244
2,745
19
Matt Mitchell
Connecticut
Grad.
5
250
209
83.6%
.268
2,723
20
Brandon Roe
Pennsylvania
Sr.
5
250
198
79.2%
.324
2,715
21
Jake Linder
New York
Jr.
5
250
209
83.6%
.241
2,664
22
Pranav Veluri
Indiana
So.
5
250
197
78.8%
.302
2,642
23
Mazin Omer
Massachusetts
So.
5
250
196
78.4%
.303
2,639
24
Chauncey Lo
New York
Jr.
5
250
204
81.6%
.258
2,623
25
Mara Russell
New York
Jr.
5
250
200
80.0%
.260
2,595
26
Noah McThenia
North Carolina
Sr.
5
250
188
75.2%
.296
2,533
27
Matt D'Annunzio
Connecticut
Fr.
5
250
196
78.4%
.261
2,530
28
Caleb Bales
Virginia
Fr.
5
250
203
81.2%
.213
2,527
29
Sam German
Minnesota
Sr.
5
250
203
81.2%
.217
2,521
30
Sarah Benner
Indiana
Sr.
5
250
184
73.6%
.313
2,498
31
Henry Blyth
Ohio
Fr.
5
250
198
79.2%
.230
2,490
32
Darren Petrosino
New Jersey
So.
5
250
193
77.2%
.249
2,476
33
Kevin Lei
Canada
Sr.
5
250
189
75.6%
.252
2,434
34
Sean Simmons
Virginia
Sr.
5
250
187
74.8%
.255
2,418
35
Eric Li
Massachusetts
Sr.
5
250
177
70.8%
.281
2,344
36
Craig Duke
Indiana
Grad.
5
250
172
68.8%
.295
2,310
37
Swapnil Garg
Massachusetts
Jr.
5
250
188
75.2%
.194
2,299
38
Jack McCalpin
North Carolina
Fr.
5
250
199
79.6%
.142
2,290
39
Siddarth Kumar
Indiana
So.
5
250
186
74.4%
.197
2,271
40
Ashwin Ganesh
Indiana
Fr.
5
250
171
68.4%
.283
2,262
41
Connor Mayers
Maryland
Fr.
5
250
177
70.8%
.233
2,220
42
Drew Jensen
Indiana
Fr.
5
250
177
70.8%
.213
2,193
43
Andrew Semak
Michigan
Sr.
5
250
181
72.4%
.190
2,193
44
Parth Jagtap
Canada
So.
5
250
163
65.2%
.241
2,078
45
Joseph Liu
Asia
Grad.
5
250
176
70.4%
.157
2,067
46
Abbey Wilson
Canada
So.
5
250
165
66.0%
.216
2,060
47
Kenneth Martin
Wisconsin
Jr.
5
250
164
65.6%
.206
2,013
48
Matthew Hoffer-Hawlik
Virginia
Grad.
5
250
151
60.4%
.254
1,935
49
Sebastian Torres
Connecticut
So.
4
200
138
69.0%
.238
1,755
50
Di Xiao
Canada
Grad.
5
250
142
56.8%
.191
1,724
51
Henry Stringer
New York
Fr.
5
250
136
54.4%
.230
1,723
52
Jake Sundberg
Louisiana
Grad.
5
250
145
58.0%
.142
1,665
53
Andrew Morin
District of Columbia
Fr.
4
200
127
63.5%
.269
1,662
54
Jessica Chellino
Florida
Grad.
5
250
130
52.0%
.219
1,599
55
Noah Corbitt
Texas
Sr.
5
250
136
54.4%
.156
1,596
56
Chris Given
Louisiana
Sr.
5
250
131
52.4%
.165
1,549
57
Lalit Maharjan
Indiana
Sr.
3
150
107
71.3%
.248
1,374
58
Adrian Wong
Canada
So.
3
150
99
66.0%
.180
1,187
59
Zachary Rogers
Louisiana
Sr.
3
150
79
52.7%
.171
939
60
Sean Jackson
South Carolina
Sr.
2
100
70
70.0%
.220
867
61
Matthew Given
Louisiana
Sr.
2
100
70
70.0%
.216
860
62
Joao de Mendonca Salim
Florida
So.
2
100
56
56.0%
.211
693
63
Raul Passement
Texas
So.
2
100
47
47.0%
.182
563
64
Becca Smith
Pennsylvania
Fr.
2
100
39
39.0%
.224
491
65
Jade Anderson
New York
So.
1
50
34
68.0%
.353
481
66
Sarah Peters
Colorado
So.
1
50
42
84.0%
.132
481
Celerity is the fraction of the question that had not been read at the time of a buzz (for which a correct answer was provided). 1.000 is an immediate buzz, .500 is an answer given halfway through the question in terms of time on the sound recording, and .000 is an answer given at the very end.