If you played in this Buzzword competition and want to see your personal results, you will need to log in.
Season results are based on each player’s five best games (out of eight).
#
Awards
Player
Region
Grade
Games
TUH
# Correct
% Correct
Average Correct Celerity
Score
1
Eric Wolfsberg
California
Grad.
5
250
230
92.0%
.496
3,672
2
Alex Schmidt
Pennsylvania
So.
5
250
240
96.0%
.440
3,645
3
Alexander Pyle
New York
So.
5
250
229
91.6%
.467
3,567
4
Ashwath Seetharaman
Texas
Jr.
5
250
221
88.4%
.432
3,352
5
Daniel Hothem
Oregon
Grad.
5
250
227
90.8%
.385
3,301
6
Nick Jensen
California
Grad.
5
250
223
89.2%
.406
3,289
7
Eric Li
Massachusetts
Sr.
5
250
215
86.0%
.441
3,277
8
Eric Rosenthal
New York
Grad.
5
250
213
85.2%
.415
3,182
9
Vikshar Athreya
Washington
Jr.
5
250
215
86.0%
.402
3,171
10
Robert Condron
Illinois
Fr.
5
250
219
87.6%
.373
3,154
11
Chauncey Lo
New York
Jr.
5
250
223
89.2%
.321
3,057
12
Lexi Terman
New Jersey
Fr.
5
250
218
87.2%
.339
3,038
13
Venu Reddy
Louisiana
Sr.
5
250
223
89.2%
.295
2,989
14
Andrew Morin
District of Columbia
Fr.
5
250
204
81.6%
.384
2,956
15
Jake Sundberg
Louisiana
Grad.
5
250
224
89.6%
.271
2,936
16
Ben Russell Jones
United Kingdom
So.
5
250
211
84.4%
.318
2,891
17
Tomás Aguilar-Fraga
California
So.
5
250
207
82.8%
.337
2,881
18
Pranav Veluri
Indiana
So.
5
250
203
81.2%
.347
2,842
19
Mazin Omer
Massachusetts
So.
5
250
186
74.4%
.435
2,814
20
Alexander Hardwick
United Kingdom
Grad.
5
250
199
79.6%
.344
2,797
21
Zane Placie
Georgia
Sr.
5
250
202
80.8%
.295
2,701
22
Sarah Benner
Indiana
Sr.
5
250
197
78.8%
.316
2,686
23
Henry Blyth
Ohio
Fr.
5
250
210
84.0%
.238
2,657
24
Matt D'Annunzio
Connecticut
Fr.
5
250
216
86.4%
.207
2,645
25
Ethan Garvin
Kentucky
Jr.
5
250
212
84.8%
.216
2,637
26
Kane Nguyen
Canada
Sr.
5
250
204
81.6%
.258
2,630
27
Noah Corbitt
Texas
Sr.
5
250
209
83.6%
.220
2,603
28
Michael Artlip
Pennsylvania
Fr.
5
250
196
78.4%
.286
2,596
29
Garrison Page
Kentucky
Jr.
5
250
205
82.0%
.221
2,555
30
Kenneth Martin
Wisconsin
Jr.
5
250
197
78.8%
.257
2,539
31
Geoffrey McGee
Massachusetts
Grad.
5
250
191
76.4%
.266
2,479
32
Craig Duke
Indiana
Grad.
5
250
190
76.0%
.255
2,442
33
Lalit Maharjan
Indiana
Sr.
5
250
184
73.6%
.262
2,397
34
Isaiah Gutman
Iowa
So.
4
200
175
87.5%
.310
2,377
35
Max Smiley
California
Grad.
4
200
169
84.5%
.336
2,352
36
Braden Boutwell
Florida
Fr.
5
250
191
76.4%
.206
2,344
37
Jeremy Cummings
Missouri
Grad.
5
250
181
72.4%
.253
2,338
38
Brandon Roe
Pennsylvania
Sr.
5
250
178
71.2%
.276
2,333
39
Brett Mattson
Michigan
5th-Yr. Sr.
5
250
189
75.6%
.193
2,293
40
Rachel Mattson
Iowa
So.
5
250
193
77.2%
.163
2,278
41
Tyler Clark
California
Fr.
5
250
184
73.6%
.192
2,236
42
Alex Dennis
Kentucky
So.
5
250
180
72.0%
.212
2,229
43
Cooper Komatsu
Illinois
Fr.
5
250
173
69.2%
.241
2,212
44
Parth Jagtap
Canada
So.
5
250
164
65.6%
.281
2,170
45
Deleena Simon
Michigan
Jr.
5
250
190
76.0%
.129
2,170
46
Jonathan Kroth
New York
Sr.
5
250
167
66.8%
.258
2,164
47
Chris Given
Louisiana
Sr.
5
250
172
68.8%
.226
2,152
48
Alex Lapuente
Illinois
Fr.
5
250
182
72.8%
.165
2,151
49
Dan Ni
New York
So.
5
250
154
61.6%
.304
2,086
50
Christian Wilson
New York
So.
5
250
158
63.2%
.255
2,035
51
Ella Uren
Michigan
Jr.
5
250
180
72.0%
.122
2,034
52
Andrew Semak
Michigan
Sr.
5
250
156
62.4%
.153
1,816
53
Jessica Chellino
Florida
Grad.
5
250
139
55.6%
.184
1,654
54
Benjamin Kitchen
Massachusetts
Sr.
2
100
74
74.0%
.331
1,024
55
Connor Coyle
District of Columbia
Fr.
2
100
79
79.0%
.223
983
56
Cade Reinberger
New York
Fr.
2
100
72
72.0%
.314
980
57
Abbey Wilson
Canada
So.
2
100
58
58.0%
.181
697
58
Vishal Puppala
Missouri
5th-Yr. Sr.
1
50
43
86.0%
.383
624
59
Zac Stapler
Pennsylvania
So.
1
50
38
76.0%
.370
548
60
Peter Blanchfield
Minnesota
Jr.
2
53
38
71.7%
.354
535
61
Travis Liebert
Kentucky
Sr.
1
50
33
66.0%
.265
425
62
Jessica Fleischer
New York
Jr.
1
50
37
74.0%
.128
423
63
Avery Strangstalien
Wisconsin
So.
1
50
24
48.0%
.163
284
Celerity is the fraction of the question that had not been read at the time of a buzz (for which a correct answer was provided). 1.000 is an immediate buzz, .500 is an answer given halfway through the question in terms of time on the sound recording, and .000 is an answer given at the very end.