ÎÞÓǶÌÊÓƵ

• Tournaments
• Buzzword Season 4 Level D Week 7
• Results
• Single-Game
• Current: Standings

Season 4 Level D Week 7

Standings

If you played in this Buzzword competition and want to see your personal results, you will need to log in.

#	Awards	Player	Region	# Correct	% Correct	Average Correct Celerity	Std. Dev. Celerity	Score
1		Neil Gurram	California	46	92.0%	.407	.218	678
2		Dylan Minarik	Wisconsin	46	92.0%	.360	.224	654
3		Matthew Jackson	District of Columbia	45	90.0%	.357	.195	642
4		Jordan Brownstein	Virginia	40	80.0%	.449	.285	617
5		Mike Sorice	Illinois	44	88.0%	.347	.227	617
6		Stephen Liu	California	42	84.0%	.371	.206	600
7		Benji Nguyen	Texas	43	86.0%	.331	.204	600
8		Michael Laudermith	Illinois	45	90.0%	.271	.205	588
9		Greg Peterson	Illinois	42	84.0%	.324	.205	578
10		Jonathan Suh	Illinois	45	90.0%	.242	.262	575
11		Sean Smiley	Virginia	45	90.0%	.221	.193	561
12		Andrew Ullsperger	Illinois	44	88.0%	.240	.179	560
13		Aidan Mehigan	New Jersey	42	84.0%	.282	.204	559
14		Hidehiro Anto	California	43	86.0%	.267	.202	558
15		Dan Puma	Illinois	45	90.0%	.219	.223	556
16		Ankit Aggarwal	California	41	82.0%	.285	.214	544
17		Chris Ottolino	Missouri	43	86.0%	.235	.205	540
18		Jeff King	Maryland	44	88.0%	.207	.191	540
19		Arthur Lee	Texas	45	90.0%	.173	.204	538
20		Iain Thoms	United Kingdom	43	86.0%	.220	.206	537
21		Adam Escandell	Texas	40	80.0%	.285	.236	532
22		Evan Nagler	New York	43	86.0%	.209	.197	532
23		Michael Bentley	Washington	44	88.0%	.178	.208	532
24		Dan Passner	New Jersey	41	82.0%	.245	.207	527
25		Scott Latchem	California	41	82.0%	.244	.194	526
26		Alan Lin	California	41	82.0%	.247	.185	522
27		Chris Romero	Texas	42	84.0%	.206	.212	521
28		Eric Douglass	South Carolina	41	82.0%	.228	.235	518
29		Christopher Gismondi	Michigan	40	80.0%	.248	.187	514
30		Aaron Dos Remedios	Canada	43	86.0%	.174	.192	514
31		Jason Hess	Texas	42	84.0%	.197	.155	508
32		Ryan Rosenberg	California	39	78.0%	.264	.242	505
33		Janice Paton	Massachusetts	43	86.0%	.163	.183	505
34		Tony Chen	Canada	42	84.0%	.177	.209	503
35		JinAh Kim	Virginia	39	78.0%	.247	.226	498
36		Ben Chametzky	Illinois	36	72.0%	.324	.267	496
37		Gerry Tansey	Missouri	40	80.0%	.213	.206	494
38		Kenji Shimizu	Michigan	36	72.0%	.314	.197	491
39		Jason Keller	New Jersey	42	84.0%	.153	.130	488
40		Victor Pavao	Massachusetts	36	72.0%	.293	.234	484
41		Dargan Ware	Alabama	39	78.0%	.221	.200	484
42		Chris White	New York	40	80.0%	.184	.197	482
43		Matthew Marcus	California	41	82.0%	.163	.188	482
44		Andrew Wang	Illinois	34	68.0%	.357	.218	481
45		James E. Lasker	Texas	37	74.0%	.266	.206	478
46		John Hanna	North Carolina	41	82.0%	.151	.186	477
47		Kevin Wang	Massachusetts	36	72.0%	.279	.246	475
48		Innis Carson	United Kingdom	39	78.0%	.193	.158	473
49		Sam Matson	Tennessee	39	78.0%	.180	.202	469
50		Max Espensen	United Kingdom	40	80.0%	.159	.217	469
51		Brian Weikle	Minnesota	39	78.0%	.191	.154	468
52		Paul Smith	North Carolina	40	80.0%	.149	.178	467
53		Carl Tjo	California	35	70.0%	.246	.218	450
54		Halle Friedman	Illinois	38	76.0%	.160	.224	450
55		Patrick Carthy	Europe	37	74.0%	.191	.159	447
56		Tamara Vardomskaya	Canada	36	72.0%	.205	.183	441
57		Julie Bratvold	California	38	76.0%	.145	.150	441
58		John Kocsis	District of Columbia	38	76.0%	.141	.145	434
59		Jean Cui	New York	36	72.0%	.175	.194	427
60		Josh Hill	Arkansas	36	72.0%	.157	.198	421
61		Wesley Mathews	Arizona	35	70.0%	.185	.228	420
62		Daniel Feitel	District of Columbia	33	66.0%	.234	.195	415
63		Mirza Ahmed	Connecticut	36	72.0%	.132	.178	410
64		Lucas Chang	California	35	70.0%	.156	.147	408
65		Tevin Li	Massachusetts	35	70.0%	.148	.177	407
66		Alan Huang	Massachusetts	33	66.0%	.184	.211	400
67		Sam Rombro	Florida	34	68.0%	.173	.171	399
68		Ben Ingram	South Carolina	31	62.0%	.250	.214	397
69		Joshua Grischow	Ohio	33	66.0%	.176	.215	395
70		Joshua Levit	Massachusetts	32	64.0%	.210	.228	393
71		Kaberi Chakrabarty	Illinois	36	72.0%	.093	.150	392
72		John Presloid	Ohio	33	66.0%	.162	.151	389
73		Toby Cox	United Kingdom	32	64.0%	.197	.241	388
74		Patrick Liao	Canada	31	62.0%	.216	.230	386
75		Aaron Lichtig	Maryland	32	64.0%	.177	.195	383
76		Guan Tong Tay	Asia	35	70.0%	.094	.131	383
77		Michael Olson	Minnesota	32	64.0%	.184	.174	381
78		Peter Schmidt	Pennsylvania	30	60.0%	.225	.243	375
79		Parikshit Chauhan	Washington	31	62.0%	.171	.188	368
80		Moses Mwesigwa Kitakule	Maryland	29	58.0%	.228	.241	365
81		Daniel Galitsky	District of Columbia	30	60.0%	.177	.181	361
82		Deb Wells	Pennsylvania	32	64.0%	.121	.164	361
83		Daniel DeFelippis	New York	33	66.0%	.079	.121	360
84		Joey Goldman	United Kingdom	25	50.0%	.368	.252	358
85		Jamie Hodari	New York	30	60.0%	.168	.182	353
86		Aaron Flicker	Ohio	28	56.0%	.214	.235	346
87		Randall Eng	New York	28	56.0%	.205	.227	346
88		Ryan Hemmel	California	31	62.0%	.125	.130	346
89		Nancy Hirsch	Georgia	31	62.0%	.116	.153	346
90		Nic Mortimer	United Kingdom	30	60.0%	.133	.186	344
91		Jason Palmer	Ohio	27	54.0%	.222	.220	338
92		Benjamin Livingston	Minnesota	27	54.0%	.197	.231	330
93		Carl Voss	Minnesota	25	50.0%	.253	.248	326
94		Garrett Johnston	Alabama	27	54.0%	.188	.204	326
95		Andrew Fisher	United Kingdom	26	52.0%	.230	.204	325
96		Andrew Almas	Canada	28	56.0%	.134	.147	319
97		Matthew Grieco	New York	27	54.0%	.151	.200	316
98		John Stewart	Virginia	26	52.0%	.179	.158	313
99		Kyle Kahan	California	25	50.0%	.190	.184	303
100		Chuck Yu	Maryland	24	48.0%	.203	.159	291
101		Alex Li	Wisconsin	22	44.0%	.257	.300	282
102		Dana Thurmond	Florida	23	46.0%	.206	.195	282
103		Phil Castagna	Pennsylvania	23	46.0%	.183	.180	276
104		Mindy Wong	New York	24	48.0%	.103	.148	266
105		Spencer Biske	Illinois	22	44.0%	.144	.161	257
106		Steve Bahnaman	North Carolina	20	66.7%	.247	.241	255
107		Jenna Hull	California	21	42.0%	.117	.156	236
108		Brian Morehouse	Connecticut	22	44.0%	.070	.141	235
109		James Carberry	Louisiana	18	36.0%	.176	.220	214
110		Denise Woodside	Missouri	16	32.0%	.085	.117	175
111		Natalie Papillion	New York	12	70.6%	.034	.148	124
112		Peter Smith	Europe	12	24.0%	.027	.136	124

Celerity is the fraction of the question that had not been read at the time of a buzz (for which a correct answer was provided). 1.000 is an immediate buzz, .500 is an answer given halfway through the question in terms of time on the sound recording, and .000 is an answer given at the very end.