ÎÞÓǶÌÊÓƵ

• Tournaments
• Buzzword Season 3 Level D Week 1
• Results
• Single-Game
• Current: Standings

Season 3 Level D Week 1

Standings

If you played in this Buzzword competition and want to see your personal results, you will need to log in.

#	Awards	Player	Region	# Correct	% Correct	Average Correct Celerity	Std. Dev. Celerity	Score
1		Neil Gurram	California	47	94.0%	.424	.238	709
2		Matthew Jackson	District of Columbia	49	98.0%	.366	.209	699
3		Steven Perry	Pennsylvania	46	92.0%	.423	.198	691
4		Dylan Minarik	Wisconsin	48	96.0%	.372	.208	689
5		Stephen Liu	California	44	88.0%	.418	.218	659
6		Anderson Wang	Maryland	49	98.0%	.298	.223	656
7		Andrew Wang	Illinois	45	90.0%	.381	.282	650
8		Benji Nguyen	Texas	46	92.0%	.341	.195	640
9		Andrew Ullsperger	Illinois	47	94.0%	.293	.226	628
10		Hidehiro Anto	California	49	98.0%	.253	.191	627
11		Kenji Shimizu	Michigan	43	86.0%	.383	.200	624
12		Jordan Brownstein	Virginia	40	80.0%	.471	.275	623
13		Ian Dewan	Europe	45	90.0%	.287	.227	598
14		Greg Peterson	Iowa	43	86.0%	.326	.213	595
15		Aidan Mehigan	New Jersey	43	86.0%	.325	.233	593
16		Jeff King	Maryland	46	92.0%	.249	.176	589
17		Michael Laudermith	Illinois	45	90.0%	.261	.195	581
18		Matthew Bollinger	Virginia	39	78.0%	.412	.231	576
19		Mike Sorice	Illinois	39	78.0%	.403	.256	575
20		Evan Nagler	New York	46	92.0%	.213	.201	572
21		Joey Goldman	United Kingdom	38	76.0%	.408	.269	564
22		Alan Lin	California	44	88.0%	.246	.186	562
23		Arthur Walden Lechner	North Carolina	44	88.0%	.241	.179	560
24		Jason Hess	Texas	45	90.0%	.223	.179	559
25		Kevin Wang	Massachusetts	38	76.0%	.398	.256	556
26		Richard Yu	New York	40	80.0%	.329	.232	553
27		Arthur Lee	Texas	44	88.0%	.229	.194	552
28		Janice Paton	Massachusetts	44	88.0%	.216	.206	547
29		Christopher Gismondi	Michigan	41	82.0%	.283	.188	546
30		Iain Thoms	United Kingdom	43	86.0%	.239	.201	545
31		Chris White	New York	44	88.0%	.214	.218	545
32		Jonathan Suh	Illinois	43	86.0%	.231	.240	544
33		Eric Douglass	South Carolina	44	88.0%	.213	.223	543
34		JinAh Kim	Virginia	42	84.0%	.251	.236	542
35		Adam Escandell	Texas	40	80.0%	.296	.242	538
36		Alan Huang	Massachusetts	41	82.0%	.265	.248	538
37		Sam Rombro	Florida	41	82.0%	.258	.239	532
38		Chris Ottolino	Missouri	44	88.0%	.180	.169	526
39		James E. Lasker	Texas	41	82.0%	.247	.213	525
40		Aayush Rajasekaran	Canada	37	74.0%	.354	.250	521
41		Dan Passner	New Jersey	40	80.0%	.254	.237	521
42		Jason Keller	New Jersey	43	86.0%	.196	.203	521
43		Dennis Beeby	Canada	39	78.0%	.289	.212	520
44		Wesley Mathews	Arizona	40	80.0%	.260	.251	520
45		Dargan Ware	Alabama	41	82.0%	.231	.182	516
46		McKinnie Lee Sizemore	Florida	41	82.0%	.227	.206	512
47		Tamara Vardomskaya	Canada	41	82.0%	.210	.217	510
48		Steven Canning	Washington	43	86.0%	.166	.185	508
49		Dan Puma	Illinois	40	80.0%	.227	.202	503
50		Chris Romero	Texas	39	78.0%	.252	.226	502
51		Ryan Rosenberg	California	36	72.0%	.333	.242	500
52		Victor Pavao	Massachusetts	40	80.0%	.213	.198	496
53		Halle Friedman	Illinois	40	80.0%	.207	.203	493
54		Michael Davies	Maryland	41	82.0%	.174	.205	492
55		Scott Latchem	California	41	82.0%	.172	.198	489
56		Anu Kashyap	California	39	78.0%	.215	.202	485
57		Sam Blizzard	District of Columbia	36	72.0%	.299	.216	483
58		Gerry Tansey	Missouri	37	74.0%	.269	.205	483
59		Sean Smiley	Virginia	37	74.0%	.264	.264	481
60		Patrick Liao	Canada	38	76.0%	.236	.237	481
61		Max Espensen	United Kingdom	39	78.0%	.194	.242	476
62		Brian Weikle	Minnesota	38	76.0%	.222	.191	473
63		John Hanna	North Carolina	38	76.0%	.215	.214	473
64		Michael Olson	Minnesota	39	78.0%	.192	.188	471
65		Shane Whitlock	Arkansas	36	72.0%	.271	.223	468
66		Henry Baer	California	38	76.0%	.213	.184	468
67		Ben Ingram	South Carolina	37	74.0%	.214	.185	456
68		Parikshit Chauhan	California	37	74.0%	.182	.162	442
69		Andrew Fisher	United Kingdom	37	74.0%	.184	.215	441
70		Jimmy Li	California	36	72.0%	.202	.186	439
71		Ben Smith	Canada	39	78.0%	.114	.130	434
72		Deb Wells	Pennsylvania	36	72.0%	.190	.189	433
73		Toby Cox	United Kingdom	36	72.0%	.181	.165	433
74		Jean Cui	New York	36	72.0%	.182	.172	432
75		Garrett Marcotte	California	37	74.0%	.156	.155	430
76		Stuart Ryan Teso-Warner	Illinois	38	76.0%	.119	.145	427
77		John Kocsis	District of Columbia	35	70.0%	.192	.198	425
78		Reuben Keller	New York	37	74.0%	.132	.157	424
79		Matthew Marcus	California	38	76.0%	.112	.156	424
80		Joshua Levit	Massachusetts	33	66.0%	.244	.236	422
81		Jury Razumau	Europe	34	68.0%	.212	.219	421
82		Eric Adams	Georgia	36	72.0%	.162	.196	420
83		Adam Swift	New York	35	70.0%	.171	.189	416
84		Jamie Hodari	New York	35	70.0%	.166	.194	413
85		Randall Eng	New York	37	74.0%	.109	.175	413
86		Benjamin Livingston	Minnesota	35	70.0%	.168	.199	412
87		Zach Dumar	Wisconsin	35	70.0%	.160	.165	412
88		Paul Smith	North Carolina	34	68.0%	.186	.192	410
89		Michael Joy	Michigan	34	68.0%	.178	.203	409
90		Moses Mwesigwa Kitakule	Maryland	30	60.0%	.288	.216	400
91		Aaron Lichtig	Maryland	35	70.0%	.142	.162	400
92		Kaberi Chakrabarty	Illinois	34	68.0%	.154	.189	397
93		Daniel Feitel	District of Columbia	33	66.0%	.161	.176	388
94		Josh Hill	Arkansas	32	64.0%	.182	.157	383
95		John Presloid	Ohio	33	66.0%	.148	.152	382
96		Guan Tong Tay	Asia	34	68.0%	.119	.124	381
97		Matthew Grieco	New York	32	64.0%	.152	.173	375
98		Nic Mortimer	United Kingdom	33	66.0%	.114	.163	370
99		Andrew Almas	Canada	30	60.0%	.181	.181	359
100		Nancy Hirsch	Georgia	32	64.0%	.112	.136	357
101		James Carberry	Louisiana	32	64.0%	.075	.094	346
102		Joshua Grischow	Ohio	29	58.0%	.152	.156	340
103		Henry Herron	Kansas	28	56.0%	.188	.207	339
104		Jason Alexander Freng	Colorado	30	60.0%	.114	.146	336
105		Joshua Finkelstein	Canada	28	56.0%	.176	.177	335
106		Greg Sandukas	New York	26	52.0%	.187	.180	313
107		Tyler Clement	Georgia	28	56.0%	.086	.113	303
108		Jeff Xie	Texas	24	48.0%	.209	.200	296
109		Vincenzo Tagle	Asia	25	50.0%	.135	.188	287
110		Mindy Wong	New York	26	52.0%	.080	.118	283
111		Alex Li	Wisconsin	23	46.0%	.172	.350	274

Celerity is the fraction of the question that had not been read at the time of a buzz (for which a correct answer was provided). 1.000 is an immediate buzz, .500 is an answer given halfway through the question in terms of time on the sound recording, and .000 is an answer given at the very end.