ÎÞÓǶÌÊÓƵ

• Tournaments
• Buzzword Football's Big Game
• Results
• Single-Game
• Current: Standings

Football's Big Game

Standings

If you played in this Buzzword competition and want to see your personal results, you will need to log in.

#	Awards	Player	Region	# Correct	% Correct	Average Correct Celerity	Std. Dev. Celerity	Score
1		Slade Gilmer	Alabama	49	98.0%	.494	.189	782
2		Ryan Friedman	New Hampshire	49	98.0%	.396	.224	720
3		Brian Van Dorn	Minnesota	47	94.0%	.442	.256	718
4		Phil Castagna	Pennsylvania	49	98.0%	.385	.256	712
5		John Hawkes	Virginia	47	94.0%	.416	.223	700
6		Brian Hight	Michigan	45	90.0%	.458	.249	697
7		David Seal	Delaware	48	96.0%	.359	.207	682
8		Erik Eide	Canada	46	92.0%	.398	.217	678
9		Tom Kelso	New York	46	92.0%	.402	.262	677
10		Tejas Raje	Illinois	48	96.0%	.352	.213	677
11		Andrew Dupont	California	49	98.0%	.324	.221	675
12		Bailey Angle	Virginia	46	92.0%	.386	.220	669
13		Andrew Becker	New York	46	92.0%	.381	.231	666
14		Brian Clark	New York	45	90.0%	.401	.215	664
15		Dan Massey	Pennsylvania	47	94.0%	.352	.234	660
16		John Krizel	Maryland	48	96.0%	.322	.216	657
17		Ben Kopnick	Minnesota	50	100.0%	.275	.240	656
18		Jonathan Marshall	California	45	90.0%	.387	.230	655
19		Forster Keenoy	Indiana	48	96.0%	.314	.211	654
20		John Bennett	Vermont	44	88.0%	.391	.261	643
21		Jonathan Graham	Ohio	47	94.0%	.313	.235	640
22		Jeff Frank	Indiana	42	84.0%	.439	.242	638
23		Dylan McCormick	Wisconsin	47	94.0%	.305	.202	638
24		Matt Aumann	Wisconsin	49	98.0%	.266	.179	637
25		Patrick McKinney	Maryland	48	96.0%	.274	.214	630
26		James Quintong	Connecticut	45	90.0%	.346	.255	627
27		Scott Latchem	California	44	88.0%	.358	.227	625
28		Charlie Rosenthal	New York	46	92.0%	.306	.232	623
29		Josh Heit	Virginia	48	96.0%	.258	.229	623
30		Naveed Chowdhury	Georgia	49	98.0%	.238	.178	623
31		Evan Nagler	New York	48	96.0%	.256	.213	620
32		Nate Kane	Arizona	41	82.0%	.426	.227	616
33		Brian Weikle	Minnesota	45	90.0%	.316	.251	616
34		Mike Sorice	Illinois	45	90.0%	.314	.204	612
35		Brian Morehouse	Connecticut	47	94.0%	.264	.228	610
36		David Kiang	Illinois	48	96.0%	.210	.174	596
37		Anthony Peek	Louisiana	46	92.0%	.256	.238	595
38		Jacob Shames	Minnesota	48	96.0%	.218	.196	595
39		Ben Koppel	New York	46	92.0%	.263	.191	593
40		Dylan Minarik	Wisconsin	47	94.0%	.229	.193	588
41		Adam Bartel	Texas	42	84.0%	.330	.232	580
42		Zach Watkins	Pennsylvania	46	92.0%	.224	.226	574
43		Joshua Levit	Massachusetts	44	88.0%	.259	.255	570
44		Duncan Stevens	Virginia	44	88.0%	.259	.239	569
45		Andrew Medlin	Louisiana	47	94.0%	.192	.182	567
46		Sean Calhoun	South Dakota	47	94.0%	.176	.171	564
47		Dan Puma	Illinois	45	90.0%	.216	.186	556
48		Ryan Hemmel	California	45	90.0%	.212	.184	553
49		Joshua Burstein	New York	42	84.0%	.279	.221	552
50		Daniel White	Washington	48	96.0%	.142	.133	549
51		Adam Swift	New York	43	86.0%	.242	.196	548
52		Christopher Pennant	Illinois	44	88.0%	.217	.184	546
53		Joe Mulcahy	Pennsylvania	45	90.0%	.187	.211	546
54		Kevin McCabe	Colorado	46	92.0%	.166	.182	544
55		Aaron Lichtig	Maryland	45	90.0%	.186	.172	542
56		Jake Stone	Georgia	41	82.0%	.250	.206	524
57		Jesse Tow	Tennessee	43	86.0%	.192	.201	521
58		Joshua Grischow	Ohio	44	88.0%	.175	.159	521
59		Jason Lai	New York	44	88.0%	.173	.243	521
60		Jason Sterlacci	New Jersey	45	90.0%	.137	.129	515
61		James Carberry	Louisiana	43	86.0%	.177	.186	512
62		Matthew LaMagna	Virginia	40	80.0%	.235	.206	508
63		Alex Connor	Ohio	42	84.0%	.174	.180	504
64		Mindy Wong	New York	43	86.0%	.154	.162	504
65		Greg Garbee	Florida	39	78.0%	.248	.214	498
66		Kyle Kahan	California	41	82.0%	.194	.184	497
67		Steven Gallen	New Jersey	42	84.0%	.171	.202	497
68		Delano Barnes	Texas	43	86.0%	.142	.189	497
69		Alan Kreisel	Florida	41	82.0%	.187	.185	495
70		Bradley Kirksey	Florida	40	80.0%	.212	.179	494
71		Ryan Rosenberg	California	41	82.0%	.177	.179	491
72		McKinnie Lee Sizemore	Florida	41	82.0%	.173	.215	489
73		Eric Adams	Georgia	38	76.0%	.253	.223	488
74		Stephen Ours	Virginia	40	80.0%	.195	.160	486
75		Nicholas Palczak	New York	39	78.0%	.200	.206	476
76		Daniel Galitsky	District of Columbia	39	78.0%	.199	.193	476
77		Michael McDuffee	Indiana	38	76.0%	.221	.226	474
78		Aaron Levine	Washington	40	80.0%	.176	.167	474
79		Chris White	New York	40	80.0%	.156	.178	468
80		Stephen Fontenot	Texas	38	76.0%	.219	.174	467
81		Ethan Levine	Illinois	39	78.0%	.170	.244	462
82		Pranav Nanga	New York	40	80.0%	.136	.149	457
83		Owen Cooper	Alabama	39	78.0%	.156	.158	455
84		Michael Kolton	Illinois	34	68.0%	.279	.296	452
85		Matthew Olsen	Illinois	39	78.0%	.124	.118	436
86		Peter Schmidt	Pennsylvania	35	70.0%	.203	.219	432
87		Garrett Johnston	Alabama	37	74.0%	.140	.154	425
88		Jason Palmer	Ohio	40	80.0%	.069	.096	425
89		Nick Luca	Pennsylvania	34	68.0%	.224	.189	424
90		Chuck Yu	Maryland	35	70.0%	.197	.203	423
91		Paul Villaluz	Nevada	38	76.0%	.113	.120	422
92		Leah Clark	Alabama	37	74.0%	.132	.180	421
93		Bill Hart	Minnesota	35	70.0%	.131	.196	397
94		Eric Douglass	South Carolina	33	66.0%	.157	.203	385
95		Matthew Hayes	Louisiana	35	70.0%	.091	.120	377
96		Jonathan Rankin	Arkansas	31	62.0%	.180	.163	369
97		Neil Gurram	California	32	64.0%	.141	.148	368
98		Nicholas Penner	Canada	30	60.0%	.195	.327	367
99		John Kocsis	District of Columbia	35	70.0%	.061	.080	367
100		Ozzie Fallick	California	32	64.0%	.112	.132	357
101		Losha Ndemeno-Tegomoh	Minnesota	31	62.0%	.071	.096	330
102		Bryan Enders	Kentucky	29	58.0%	.125	.135	327
103		Danny Eisgruber	Illinois	31	62.0%	.048	.102	322
104		Anthony Colangelo	Canada	30	60.0%	.062	.159	319
105		Gopal Hariharan	Texas	28	56.0%	.130	.200	317
106		Daniel Case	Michigan	29	58.0%	.061	.157	304
107		Ankit Aggarwal	California	26	52.0%	.132	.143	293
108		Brad Williams	Wisconsin	26	52.0%	.121	.175	293
109		Rudra Ranganathan	Massachusetts	25	50.0%	.128	.136	283
110		Kremlin Gil	New York	23	46.0%	.056	.163	244
111		Daniel DeFelippis	New York	22	44.0%	.076	.105	237
112		Carl Tjo	California	12	80.0%	.067	.126	127
113		Jacob Sjostrom	Florida	7	70.0%	.114	.164	79

Celerity is the fraction of the question that had not been read at the time of a buzz (for which a correct answer was provided). 1.000 is an immediate buzz, .500 is an answer given halfway through the question in terms of time on the sound recording, and .000 is an answer given at the very end.