ÎÞÓǶÌÊÓƵ

• Tournaments
• Buzzword Baseball Special 2
• Results
• Single-Game
• Current: Standings

Baseball Special 2

Standings

If you played in this Buzzword competition and want to see your personal results, you will need to log in.

#	Awards	Player	Region	# Correct	% Correct	Average Correct Celerity	Std. Dev. Celerity	Score
1		Naveed Chowdhury	Georgia	49	98.0%	.383	.213	709
2		Joseph Sheehan	New York	47	94.0%	.428	.230	706
3		Slade Gilmer	Alabama	49	98.0%	.362	.245	699
4		Jonathan Mishory	Illinois	49	98.0%	.357	.203	695
5		Ben Koppel	New York	47	94.0%	.395	.183	691
6		Dan Massey	Pennsylvania	48	96.0%	.342	.225	672
7		Ryan Luptak	Illinois	47	94.0%	.345	.213	661
8		Wayne Randazzo	New York	45	90.0%	.393	.205	654
9		Gabriel Ajzenman	New York	46	92.0%	.355	.260	650
10		Scott Latchem	California	47	94.0%	.319	.239	645
11		Aaron Flicker	Ohio	45	90.0%	.371	.184	642
12		Phil Castagna	Pennsylvania	46	92.0%	.324	.218	632
13		Sean Briody	South Carolina	43	86.0%	.396	.262	630
14		Stu Landes	Florida	44	88.0%	.343	.191	617
15		Jeff Frank	Indiana	47	94.0%	.272	.245	617
16		Christopher Pennant	Illinois	43	86.0%	.352	.254	609
17		Dan Passner	New Jersey	43	86.0%	.350	.228	609
18		Ben Kopnick	Minnesota	46	92.0%	.279	.224	607
19		Dan Puma	Illinois	45	90.0%	.302	.172	606
20		David Seal	Delaware	47	94.0%	.253	.229	604
21		Tianyuan Zhou	Connecticut	45	90.0%	.291	.242	600
22		Craig Barker	Michigan	47	94.0%	.239	.217	596
23		Sam Sabulis	Georgia	47	94.0%	.226	.197	592
24		James Quintong	Connecticut	44	88.0%	.295	.173	588
25		Jeremy Frank	Illinois	45	90.0%	.271	.213	587
26		Andrew Stockmann	Kansas	37	74.0%	.483	.171	584
27		Randall Eng	New York	46	92.0%	.238	.183	584
28		Josh Heit	Virginia	45	90.0%	.265	.193	582
29		Michael Mathison	Wisconsin	47	94.0%	.213	.206	578
30		Tejas Raje	Illinois	46	92.0%	.221	.213	575
31		Jesse Tow	Tennessee	45	90.0%	.228	.190	564
32		Michael Adelman	New York	43	86.0%	.268	.210	563
33		Mike Shara	Canada	41	82.0%	.319	.231	560
34		Brian Morehouse	Connecticut	45	90.0%	.223	.160	560
35		Lars Melton	Virginia	42	84.0%	.289	.231	559
36		Paul Campbell	California	47	94.0%	.172	.185	555
37		Jacob Shames	Minnesota	42	84.0%	.283	.217	553
38		Jonathan Graham	Ohio	44	88.0%	.224	.160	550
39		Nate Kane	Arizona	39	78.0%	.345	.248	546
40		Sean Calhoun	South Dakota	44	88.0%	.216	.187	546
41		Adam Bartel	Texas	40	80.0%	.305	.182	539
42		Steve Bahnaman	North Carolina	40	80.0%	.302	.208	539
43		Matthew LaMagna	Virginia	44	88.0%	.196	.216	538
44		Ryan Foley	New York	48	96.0%	.117	.150	535
45		Anthony DiComo	New York	44	88.0%	.201	.206	534
46		Chris Bybee	Arizona	43	86.0%	.215	.211	533
47		Erik Eide	Canada	39	78.0%	.315	.241	532
48		Joshua Grischow	Ohio	45	90.0%	.166	.196	532
49		Andrew Medlin	Louisiana	42	84.0%	.225	.226	524
50		Eugene Hung	California	40	80.0%	.259	.198	519
51		Akosua Asante	Canada	42	84.0%	.218	.202	517
52		Brian Hight	Michigan	38	76.0%	.311	.243	516
53		James Dowd	Hawaii	40	80.0%	.252	.215	514
54		William O'Brien	New York	45	90.0%	.136	.169	513
55		Nicholas Penner	Canada	40	80.0%	.242	.219	512
56		Robert Kilner	Ohio	40	80.0%	.237	.215	505
57		Steven Gallen	New Jersey	41	82.0%	.208	.208	505
58		Matt Aumann	Wisconsin	42	84.0%	.184	.204	501
59		Anthony Peek	Louisiana	40	80.0%	.216	.185	495
60		Alan Kreisel	Florida	42	84.0%	.155	.195	494
61		Josh Sweren	Virginia	38	76.0%	.241	.222	483
62		Chuck Yu	Maryland	41	82.0%	.168	.194	481
63		Kevin McCabe	Colorado	41	82.0%	.152	.179	479
64		Jason Lai	New York	43	86.0%	.101	.157	475
65		Daniel Galitsky	District of Columbia	39	78.0%	.194	.212	474
66		James Carberry	Louisiana	40	80.0%	.167	.197	473
67		Ryan Rosenberg	California	39	78.0%	.187	.208	467
68		Robert Tuck	New Jersey	42	84.0%	.087	.138	459
69		Robert Aitken Jr.	New Jersey	35	70.0%	.262	.216	455
70		Bailey Angle	Virginia	35	70.0%	.250	.239	451
71		Ethan Levine	Illinois	38	76.0%	.168	.167	451
72		Adam Escandell	Texas	36	72.0%	.226	.210	450
73		Neil Gurram	California	38	76.0%	.171	.175	450
74		Dylan Minarik	Wisconsin	37	74.0%	.192	.173	447
75		James E. Lasker	Texas	35	70.0%	.233	.206	438
76		Eric Adams	Georgia	36	72.0%	.184	.195	433
77		Ryan Kirby	Alabama	30	60.0%	.380	.229	432
78		Tyler Berry	Canada	35	70.0%	.199	.218	430
79		Joshua Levit	Massachusetts	34	68.0%	.213	.200	420
80		Devon Edwards	New York	30	60.0%	.317	.251	409
81		Daniel Waldman	California	31	62.0%	.276	.241	407
82		Robert Diethrich	Texas	30	60.0%	.293	.228	402
83		Tom Kelso	New York	30	60.0%	.292	.238	398
84		Colin Cavanagh	Virginia	30	60.0%	.284	.227	398
85		John Hanna	North Carolina	30	60.0%	.232	.206	379
86		Jack Rousseau	California	32	64.0%	.170	.201	379
87		John Monahan	Europe	32	64.0%	.169	.179	379
88		David Kiang	Illinois	32	64.0%	.165	.161	376
89		Brock Stephenson	Canada	31	62.0%	.184	.169	370
90		Dargan Ware	Alabama	30	60.0%	.206	.185	366
91		Michael Kolton	Illinois	31	62.0%	.163	.185	365
92		Eric Gerbehy	New Jersey	29	58.0%	.221	.221	363
93		Stephen Ours	Virginia	33	66.0%	.099	.117	362
94		Tyler Gorsegner	New Mexico	30	60.0%	.172	.209	355
95		Greg Garbee	Florida	31	62.0%	.109	.140	342
96		Eric Douglass	South Carolina	29	58.0%	.166	.201	340
97		Bill Hart	Minnesota	28	56.0%	.168	.204	333
98		Tyler Miller	New York	28	56.0%	.100	.122	310
99		Delano Barnes	Texas	29	58.0%	.051	.093	306
100		Matthew Grieco	New York	26	52.0%	.131	.142	296
101		Owen Cooper	Alabama	24	48.0%	.178	.311	288
102		Losha Ndemeno-Tegomoh	Minnesota	26	52.0%	.092	.132	282
103		Peter Schmidt	Pennsylvania	23	51.1%	.196	.225	281
104		Patrick Carthy	Europe	24	48.0%	.068	.105	255
105		Andrey Goder	California	22	44.0%	.099	.125	243
106		Andrew Fisher	United Kingdom	20	40.0%	.161	.176	233
107		Kristin Pierce	Missouri	22	44.0%	.050	.095	231
108		Rudra Ranganathan	Massachusetts	18	36.0%	.077	.107	193
109		Keenan Bigg	Illinois	14	56.0%	.288	.268	187
110		Kyle Evans	Arizona	15	83.3%	.150	.190	173
111		Edward Sanfrey	Ohio	15	30.0%	.109	.139	168
112		Joey Block	Missouri	11	50.0%	.144	.181	127

Celerity is the fraction of the question that had not been read at the time of a buzz (for which a correct answer was provided). 1.000 is an immediate buzz, .500 is an answer given halfway through the question in terms of time on the sound recording, and .000 is an answer given at the very end.