2024 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament
Date: |
Friday, April 5, 2024 – Saturday, April 6, 2024 |
Host: |
Hyatt Regency O'Hare Chicago (Rosemont, IL) |
Division I Pool W
The displayed ranks are the order of finish within each pool. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
Pool X
# |
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
1 |
WUSTL | 7–0 | 100.0% | 2775 | 154 | 27 |
69 |
14 | 18.23 | 360.39 |
---|
2 |
Cornell A | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2130 | 152 | 20 |
62 |
18 | 15.85 | 280.26 |
---|
3 |
Texas | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1530 | 152 | 6 |
59 |
12 | 14.00 | 201.32 |
---|
4 |
Chicago B | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1475 | 154 | 7 |
57 |
16 | 13.75 | 191.56 |
---|
5 |
Iowa State | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1475 | 150 | 7 |
54 |
8 | 14.26 | 196.67 |
---|
6 |
UCLA | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1335 | 151 | 11 |
47 |
12 | 13.10 | 176.82 |
---|
7 |
Illinois B | 1–6 | 14.3% | 850 | 150 | 6 |
40 |
14 | 9.35 | 113.33 |
---|
8 |
MIT | 0–7 | 0.0% | 950 | 145 | 5 |
46 |
19 | 10.00 | 131.03 |
---|
Pool Y
# |
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
1 |
Stanford | 7–0 | 100.0% | 3240 | 161 | 39 |
68 |
19 | 19.35 | 402.48 |
---|
2 |
Toronto A | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2150 | 156 | 12 |
74 |
18 | 15.35 | 275.64 |
---|
3 |
Columbia A | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2255 | 153 | 11 |
74 |
8 | 16.35 | 294.77 |
---|
4 |
Illinois A | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1760 | 157 | 11 |
63 |
15 | 14.05 | 224.20 |
---|
5 |
Indiana | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1500 | 159 | 9 |
53 |
15 | 14.68 | 188.68 |
---|
6 |
Penn State | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1160 | 159 | 6 |
49 |
24 | 12.73 | 145.91 |
---|
7 |
Chicago C | 1–6 | 14.3% | 915 | 163 | 9 |
33 |
14 | 12.38 | 112.27 |
---|
8 |
Minnesota B | 0–7 | 0.0% | 670 | 164 | 3 |
32 |
9 | 10.00 | 81.71 |
---|
Pool Z
# |
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
1 |
UC Berkeley A | 7–0 | 100.0% | 2680 | 159 | 17 |
83 |
11 | 16.50 | 337.11 |
---|
2 |
Georgia Tech | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2185 | 161 | 18 |
67 |
27 | 16.24 | 271.43 |
---|
3 |
Northwestern | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1895 | 158 | 9 |
68 |
16 | 15.06 | 239.87 |
---|
4 |
Brown | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1425 | 159 | 7 |
56 |
14 | 13.17 | 179.25 |
---|
5 |
Minnesota A | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1590 | 153 | 14 |
51 |
16 | 14.62 | 207.84 |
---|
6 |
Rutgers | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1495 | 158 | 8 |
60 |
15 | 12.50 | 189.24 |
---|
7 |
Michigan A | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1145 | 157 | 5 |
47 |
10 | 12.50 | 145.86 |
---|
8 |
Florida | 0–7 | 0.0% | 875 | 157 | 6 |
38 |
9 | 10.23 | 111.46 |
---|
Division II Pool WW
The displayed ranks are the order of finish within each pool. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
# |
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
1 |
Missouri | 7–0 | 100.0% | 2980 | 163 | 30 |
66 |
12 | 20.10 | 365.64 |
---|
2 |
Yale | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2300 | 165 | 21 |
60 |
17 | 18.15 | 278.79 |
---|
3 |
Purdue A | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2010 | 158 | 15 |
58 |
7 | 16.99 | 254.43 |
---|
4 |
Caltech | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1875 | 159 | 16 |
53 |
13 | 16.96 | 235.85 |
---|
5 |
McMaster | 4–3 | 57.1% | 2275 | 161 | 28 |
53 |
21 | 17.65 | 282.61 |
---|
6 |
Chicago F | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1855 | 157 | 13 |
56 |
6 | 16.38 | 236.31 |
---|
7 |
Tennessee | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1130 | 158 | 9 |
37 |
7 | 14.35 | 143.04 |
---|
8 |
Redlands CC | 0–7 | 0.0% | 1120 | 157 | 9 |
42 |
7 | 11.76 | 142.68 |
---|
Pool XX
# |
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
1 |
NYU | 7–0 | 100.0% | 3005 | 163 | 31 |
69 |
16 | 19.30 | 368.71 |
---|
2 |
Chicago E | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2395 | 164 | 26 |
61 |
11 | 16.67 | 292.07 |
---|
3 |
Toronto B | 4–3 | 57.1% | 2390 | 160 | 21 |
61 |
9 | 18.41 | 298.75 |
---|
4 |
Maryland B | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1725 | 167 | 16 |
53 |
11 | 14.64 | 206.59 |
---|
5 |
Oklahoma | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1530 | 160 | 5 |
60 |
21 | 14.77 | 191.25 |
---|
6 |
SIU-Edwardsville | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1495 | 165 | 10 |
50 |
21 | 15.83 | 181.21 |
---|
7 |
Cornell C | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1900 | 164 | 18 |
49 |
12 | 17.91 | 231.71 |
---|
8 |
Arizona State | 0–7 | 0.0% | 1025 | 163 | 7 |
40 |
14 | 12.55 | 125.77 |
---|
Pool YY
# |
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
1 |
Columbia B | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2785 | 160 | 32 |
59 |
23 | 20.11 | 348.12 |
---|
2 |
Chicago D | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2410 | 161 | 30 |
52 |
22 | 18.90 | 299.38 |
---|
3 |
British Columbia | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1875 | 153 | 19 |
55 |
18 | 15.27 | 245.10 |
---|
4 |
Michigan State | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2080 | 159 | 23 |
55 |
21 | 16.54 | 261.64 |
---|
5 |
UCF | 4–3 | 57.1% | 2305 | 160 | 24 |
58 |
11 | 17.32 | 288.12 |
---|
6 |
Ottawa | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1600 | 155 | 13 |
54 |
21 | 14.48 | 206.45 |
---|
7 |
Syracuse | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1265 | 152 | 12 |
38 |
7 | 14.80 | 166.45 |
---|
8 |
Murray State | 1–6 | 14.3% | 785 | 154 | 1 |
39 |
10 | 10.75 | 101.95 |
---|
Explanation of Statistics
Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.
Read