2006 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament
| Date: | Friday, April 7, 2006 – Saturday, April 8, 2006 |
|---|---|
| Host: | University of Maryland-College Park (College Park, MD) |
Division I Pool A
Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
| Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Berkeley | 7–0 | 100.0% | 2995 | 164 | 31 | 66 | 23 | 20.46 | 365.24 |
| Chicago A | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2485 | 163 | 24 | 62 | 17 | 18.49 | 304.91 |
| U of Rochester | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1760 | 162 | 16 | 55 | 19 | 15.00 | 217.28 |
| Williams A | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1370 | 141 | 10 | 47 | 13 | 14.30 | 194.33 |
| Texas A&M | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1390 | 138 | 13 | 45 | 10 | 13.71 | 201.45 |
| Minnesota | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1240 | 158 | 4 | 51 | 13 | 13.36 | 156.96 |
| Harding | 2–5 | 28.6% | 890 | 163 | 1 | 45 | 11 | 10.43 | 109.20 |
| Williams B | 0–7 | 0.0% | 435 | 115 | 2 | 23 | 5 | 8.00 | 75.65 |
Pool B
| Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Illinois | 7–0 | 100.0% | 2590 | 162 | 27 | 60 | 18 | 19.25 | 319.75 |
| UCLA | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2195 | 161 | 13 | 66 | 8 | 17.47 | 272.67 |
| Princeton | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2105 | 161 | 13 | 65 | 15 | 17.12 | 261.49 |
| Yale | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1655 | 156 | 8 | 60 | 18 | 15.07 | 212.18 |
| Texas | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1785 | 156 | 14 | 57 | 18 | 15.42 | 228.85 |
| Wisconsin | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1425 | 159 | 13 | 48 | 21 | 14.02 | 179.25 |
| McGill | 1–6 | 14.3% | 985 | 163 | 8 | 37 | 9 | 12.00 | 120.86 |
| Florida | 0–7 | 0.0% | 830 | 162 | 4 | 38 | 10 | 10.48 | 102.47 |
Pool C
| Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brown | 7–0 | 100.0% | 1880 | 145 | 15 | 63 | 5 | 13.64 | 259.31 |
| Virginia | 6–1 | 85.7% | 1965 | 136 | 21 | 56 | 18 | 15.53 | 288.97 |
| Chicago B | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1405 | 134 | 11 | 53 | 20 | 12.66 | 209.70 |
| Carleton College | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1680 | 143 | 11 | 55 | 6 | 15.08 | 234.97 |
| Carnegie Mellon | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1315 | 145 | 8 | 51 | 13 | 12.71 | 181.38 |
| Georgia | 2–5 | 28.6% | 435 | 145 | 3 | 24 | 7 | 6.85 | 60.00 |
| Simon Fraser | 1–6 | 14.3% | 430 | 142 | 4 | 20 | 3 | 7.71 | 60.56 |
| USC | 0–7 | 0.0% |
Pool D
| Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2115 | 147 | 10 | 63 | 7 | 18.77 | 287.76 |
| VCU | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2150 | 155 | 18 | 65 | 13 | 15.60 | 277.42 |
| Vanderbilt | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1485 | 159 | 6 | 61 | 19 | 13.13 | 186.79 |
| North Carolina | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1560 | 153 | 9 | 60 | 22 | 13.75 | 203.92 |
| Michigan | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1360 | 151 | 14 | 48 | 22 | 13.00 | 180.13 |
| Dartmouth | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1190 | 156 | 4 | 48 | 21 | 14.52 | 152.56 |
| Rutgers | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1160 | 151 | 4 | 48 | 3 | 12.21 | 153.64 |
| Ottawa | 1–6 | 14.3% | 820 | 152 | 10 | 36 | 11 | 7.93 | 107.89 |
Division II Pool A
Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
| Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2560 | 148 | 21 | 71 | 22 | 17.88 | 345.95 |
| Florida State | 6–1 | 85.7% | 1555 | 153 | 12 | 57 | 20 | 13.12 | 203.27 |
| Grinnell | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1400 | 152 | 10 | 52 | 11 | 12.66 | 184.21 |
| Oklahoma State | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1350 | 153 | 10 | 51 | 15 | 12.54 | 176.47 |
| Chicago | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1260 | 152 | 18 | 33 | 18 | 14.71 | 165.79 |
| George Washington | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1090 | 150 | 12 | 40 | 4 | 10.19 | 145.33 |
| Emory-Oxford | 1–6 | 14.3% | 600 | 155 | 4 | 31 | 9 | 7.86 | 77.42 |
| State College-Manatee | 1–6 | 14.3% | 495 | 149 | 1 | 29 | 8 | 7.67 | 66.44 |
Pool B
| Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amherst | 7–0 | 100.0% | 2020 | 150 | 15 | 61 | 12 | 16.38 | 269.33 |
| Princeton A | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2130 | 144 | 11 | 69 | 9 | 16.50 | 295.83 |
| Georgia | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1550 | 144 | 6 | 57 | 13 | 15.16 | 215.28 |
| Virginia | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1265 | 143 | 6 | 48 | 9 | 13.70 | 176.92 |
| UCLA | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1025 | 143 | 5 | 50 | 17 | 9.73 | 143.36 |
| Coastal Alabama - South | 3–4 | 42.9% | 975 | 145 | 4 | 44 | 15 | 11.46 | 134.48 |
| Louisiana-Lafayette | 1–6 | 14.3% | 825 | 152 | 6 | 38 | 7 | 8.86 | 108.55 |
| Cloud County CC | 0–7 | 0.0% | 225 | 153 | 1 | 17 | 12 | 5.56 | 29.41 |
Pool C
| Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caltech | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2125 | 163 | 18 | 70 | 23 | 14.43 | 260.74 |
| Princeton B | 6–1 | 85.7% | 1630 | 163 | 11 | 63 | 21 | 12.70 | 200.00 |
| Columbia | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1770 | 163 | 11 | 68 | 25 | 13.29 | 217.18 |
| Johns Hopkins | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1315 | 160 | 5 | 58 | 7 | 11.03 | 164.38 |
| Broward | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1125 | 159 | 9 | 43 | 11 | 11.83 | 141.51 |
| Oklahoma | 2–5 | 28.6% | 980 | 163 | 3 | 48 | 13 | 10.20 | 120.25 |
| Bevill-Jasper | 1–6 | 14.3% | 590 | 160 | 4 | 34 | 12 | 6.58 | 73.75 |
| Hamline | 0–7 | 0.0% | 325 | 163 | 0 | 26 | 5 | 3.46 | 39.88 |
Pool D
| Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard | 7–0 | 100.0% | 2675 | 155 | 13 | 80 | 12 | 18.71 | 345.16 |
| Michigan | 6–1 | 85.7% | 1465 | 155 | 10 | 54 | 16 | 13.36 | 189.03 |
| Carleton College | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1490 | 156 | 3 | 60 | 16 | 14.68 | 191.03 |
| Maryland | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1415 | 154 | 11 | 51 | 10 | 12.74 | 183.77 |
| Vanderbilt | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1190 | 148 | 3 | 53 | 14 | 12.23 | 160.81 |
| Southern Virginia | 2–5 | 28.6% | 955 | 152 | 5 | 45 | 17 | 10.30 | 125.66 |
| Valencia | 2–5 | 28.6% | 680 | 155 | 5 | 35 | 28 | 9.88 | 87.74 |
| Snead State | 1–6 | 14.3% | 815 | 155 | 7 | 36 | 15 | 9.88 | 105.16 |