2008 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament
Date: |
Friday, April 11, 2008 – Saturday, April 12, 2008 |
Host: |
Washington University in St. Louis (St. Louis, MO) |
Division I Pool A
Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Chicago | 7–0 | 100.0% | 2700 | 155 | 24 |
72 |
12 | 17.50 | 348.39 |
---|
Vanderbilt | 6–1 | 85.7% | 1515 | 162 | 12 |
57 |
20 | 12.54 | 187.04 |
---|
Carleton College | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1730 | 153 | 15 |
60 |
11 | 12.80 | 226.14 |
---|
Dartmouth | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1685 | 152 | 7 |
69 |
12 | 12.50 | 221.71 |
---|
WUSTL | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1505 | 155 | 10 |
59 |
19 | 12.46 | 194.19 |
---|
Florida State | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1295 | 158 | 6 |
53 |
15 | 12.71 | 163.92 |
---|
UCLA | 1–6 | 14.3% | 970 | 151 | 8 |
43 |
8 | 9.02 | 128.48 |
---|
Oklahoma | 0–7 | 0.0% | 615 | 154 | 1 |
35 |
2 | 7.22 | 79.87 |
---|
Pool B
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Maryland | 7–0 | 100.0% | 2225 | 143 | 25 |
56 |
28 | 17.65 | 311.19 |
---|
Harvard | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1420 | 136 | 12 |
48 |
8 | 13.33 | 208.82 |
---|
Florida | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1335 | 141 | 10 |
51 |
13 | 12.33 | 189.36 |
---|
Minnesota | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1225 | 134 | 3 |
54 |
10 | 12.55 | 182.84 |
---|
Georgia | 4–3 | 57.1% | 955 | 134 | 11 |
39 |
9 | 8.90 | 142.54 |
---|
Toronto | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1050 | 141 | 7 |
42 |
9 | 11.63 | 148.94 |
---|
Stanford B | 1–6 | 14.3% | 830 | 137 | 2 |
43 |
12 | 9.56 | 121.17 |
---|
Pool D
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
UC Irvine | 7–0 | 100.0% | 2050 | 147 | 16 |
65 |
13 | 15.12 | 278.91 |
---|
Brown | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2015 | 141 | 14 |
68 |
12 | 14.45 | 285.82 |
---|
Iowa | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1685 | 144 | 12 |
58 |
13 | 14.14 | 234.03 |
---|
VCU | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1040 | 142 | 4 |
52 |
16 | 9.64 | 146.48 |
---|
Princeton | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1250 | 145 | 11 |
49 |
7 | 10.50 | 172.41 |
---|
UT-Chattanooga | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1185 | 140 | 6 |
52 |
17 | 11.38 | 169.29 |
---|
Illinois B | 1–6 | 14.3% | 835 | 152 | 3 |
44 |
10 | 8.51 | 109.87 |
---|
Alabama | 0–7 | 0.0% | 585 | 143 | 2 |
35 |
17 | 7.84 | 81.82 |
---|
Division II Pool A
Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
Pool B
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Western Ontario | 7–0 | 100.0% | 1975 | 161 | 10 |
69 |
15 | 15.32 | 245.34 |
---|
Cornell | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1880 | 141 | 7 |
66 |
14 | 16.23 | 266.67 |
---|
Iowa | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1390 | 159 | 13 |
52 |
26 | 12.38 | 174.84 |
---|
Missouri S&T | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1310 | 135 | 2 |
58 |
4 | 12.00 | 194.07 |
---|
Florida | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1020 | 134 | 6 |
42 |
9 | 11.56 | 152.24 |
---|
Gulf Coast CC | 2–5 | 28.6% | 825 | 163 | 6 |
41 |
19 | 8.94 | 101.23 |
---|
Alabama | 1–6 | 14.3% | 615 | 138 | 2 |
36 |
8 | 6.97 | 89.13 |
---|
Pratt CC | 0–7 | 0.0% | 265 | 161 | 2 |
17 |
7 | 5.26 | 32.92 |
---|
Explanation of Statistics
Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.
Read