2011 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament
Date: |
Friday, April 8, 2011 – Saturday, April 9, 2011 |
Host: |
Hyatt Regency O'Hare Chicago (Rosemont, IL) |
Division I Pool A
Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Minnesota | 7–0 | 100.0% | 3225 | 168 | 20 |
96 |
17 | 17.67 | 383.93 |
---|
VCU | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2400 | 161 | 11 |
79 |
13 | 16.78 | 298.14 |
---|
Michigan A | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2135 | 160 | 18 |
66 |
19 | 15.48 | 266.88 |
---|
RPI | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1570 | 163 | 8 |
62 |
14 | 12.86 | 192.64 |
---|
Lawrence | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1395 | 155 | 10 |
57 |
17 | 11.34 | 180.00 |
---|
Ottawa | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1050 | 163 | 10 |
42 |
6 | 9.81 | 128.83 |
---|
Ohio State | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1245 | 163 | 6 |
53 |
23 | 12.54 | 152.76 |
---|
Chicago C | 0–7 | 0.0% | 485 | 159 | 3 |
23 |
4 | 8.85 | 61.01 |
---|
Pool B
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Brown | 7–0 | 100.0% | 2810 | 159 | 30 |
72 |
20 | 17.06 | 353.46 |
---|
Chicago A | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2725 | 159 | 25 |
72 |
18 | 17.73 | 342.77 |
---|
Rice | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1960 | 156 | 10 |
68 |
8 | 15.00 | 251.28 |
---|
Columbia | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1600 | 160 | 10 |
59 |
18 | 13.77 | 200.00 |
---|
Michigan B | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1185 | 164 | 5 |
56 |
14 | 10.51 | 144.51 |
---|
Stanford | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1345 | 151 | 3 |
58 |
16 | 13.33 | 178.15 |
---|
Western Ontario | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1240 | 150 | 8 |
44 |
6 | 13.65 | 165.33 |
---|
Northwestern | 0–7 | 0.0% | 595 | 151 | 3 |
33 |
10 | 7.50 | 78.81 |
---|
Pool C
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Harvard | 7–0 | 100.0% | 3330 | 160 | 44 |
71 |
12 | 17.57 | 416.25 |
---|
Illinois | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2700 | 162 | 21 |
80 |
23 | 16.83 | 333.33 |
---|
Maryland | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2070 | 162 | 11 |
74 |
15 | 14.59 | 255.56 |
---|
Alabama | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1420 | 166 | 5 |
56 |
15 | 14.10 | 171.08 |
---|
Toronto | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1020 | 167 | 8 |
42 |
20 | 11.60 | 122.16 |
---|
WUSTL | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1135 | 163 | 6 |
52 |
11 | 10.00 | 139.26 |
---|
Arizona State | 2–5 | 28.6% | 965 | 152 | 12 |
39 |
13 | 9.02 | 126.97 |
---|
Cornell | 0–7 | 0.0% | 445 | 154 | 0 |
25 |
5 | 8.80 | 57.79 |
---|
Pool D
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Yale | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2535 | 157 | 16 |
78 |
13 | 16.81 | 322.93 |
---|
Carleton College | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2095 | 151 | 19 |
65 |
18 | 14.88 | 277.48 |
---|
UC Irvine | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1930 | 152 | 10 |
68 |
10 | 14.74 | 253.95 |
---|
Virginia | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1895 | 158 | 19 |
66 |
6 | 11.53 | 239.87 |
---|
Chicago B | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1440 | 146 | 9 |
53 |
11 | 13.39 | 197.26 |
---|
Oxford | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1270 | 147 | 13 |
47 |
9 | 10.83 | 172.79 |
---|
Texas A&M | 1–6 | 14.3% | 670 | 159 | 11 |
22 |
15 | 10.91 | 84.28 |
---|
Boise State | 0–7 | 0.0% | 550 | 156 | 4 |
29 |
10 | 7.58 | 70.51 |
---|
Division II Pool A
Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Yale | 7–0 | 100.0% | 4375 | 166 | 47 |
83 |
8 | 22.15 | 527.11 |
---|
VCU | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2575 | 167 | 29 |
63 |
14 | 17.17 | 308.38 |
---|
Michigan | 4–3 | 57.1% | 2485 | 167 | 23 |
63 |
28 | 19.19 | 297.60 |
---|
Northern Illinois | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1870 | 171 | 15 |
62 |
13 | 14.16 | 218.71 |
---|
Chicago B | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1855 | 163 | 20 |
49 |
17 | 16.67 | 227.61 |
---|
North Carolina | 2–5 | 28.6% | 990 | 164 | 4 |
45 |
10 | 10.82 | 120.73 |
---|
Snead State | 2–5 | 28.6% | 860 | 162 | 9 |
37 |
15 | 9.35 | 106.17 |
---|
Chipola B | 0–7 | 0.0% | 375 | 168 | 1 |
20 |
6 | 9.05 | 44.64 |
---|
Pool B
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Chicago A | 7–0 | 100.0% | 3410 | 165 | 41 |
63 |
19 | 21.73 | 413.33 |
---|
WUSTL | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2610 | 164 | 30 |
62 |
20 | 17.83 | 318.29 |
---|
George Mason | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2410 | 162 | 25 |
59 |
7 | 17.62 | 297.53 |
---|
Northwestern | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2270 | 165 | 27 |
59 |
19 | 15.93 | 275.15 |
---|
Maryland | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1610 | 159 | 17 |
46 |
21 | 15.87 | 202.52 |
---|
Illinois | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1140 | 161 | 8 |
47 |
24 | 12.18 | 141.61 |
---|
Cornell | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1165 | 165 | 8 |
47 |
13 | 11.64 | 141.21 |
---|
Valencia | 1–6 | 14.3% | 675 | 161 | 3 |
32 |
10 | 10.29 | 83.85 |
---|
Pool D
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Ohio State A | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2945 | 163 | 33 |
63 |
18 | 19.90 | 361.35 |
---|
Minnesota | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2330 | 160 | 18 |
67 |
10 | 16.94 | 291.25 |
---|
Chipola A | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2425 | 165 | 21 |
67 |
20 | 17.50 | 293.94 |
---|
Stanford | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1920 | 160 | 9 |
63 |
17 | 17.22 | 240.00 |
---|
Harvard | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1580 | 163 | 5 |
61 |
9 | 14.24 | 193.87 |
---|
Carleton College | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1395 | 158 | 11 |
47 |
8 | 13.79 | 176.58 |
---|
Alabama | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1330 | 162 | 6 |
51 |
6 | 13.33 | 164.20 |
---|
Guelph | 0–7 | 0.0% | 1065 | 165 | 12 |
37 |
9 | 11.43 | 129.09 |
---|
Explanation of Statistics
Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.
Read