2023 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament
Date: |
Friday, March 31, 2023 – Saturday, April 1, 2023 |
Host: |
Hyatt Regency O'Hare Chicago (Rosemont, IL) |
Division I Pool A
The displayed ranks are the order of finish within each pool. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
# |
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
1 |
Cornell A | 7–0 | 100.0% | 2565 | 162 | 34 |
53 |
13 | 18.28 | 316.67 |
---|
2 |
Chicago A | 5–2 | 71.4% | 3150 | 165 | 30 |
70 |
10 | 20.50 | 381.82 |
---|
3 |
WUSTL A | 4–3 | 57.1% | 2100 | 156 | 16 |
62 |
18 | 17.05 | 269.23 |
---|
3 |
Ohio State A | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1965 | 160 | 16 |
57 |
13 | 16.71 | 245.62 |
---|
5 |
Virginia | 3–4 | 42.9% | 2050 | 161 | 21 |
55 |
23 | 17.11 | 254.66 |
---|
5 |
Georgia Tech A | 3–4 | 42.9% | 2030 | 161 | 28 |
47 |
18 | 16.40 | 252.17 |
---|
7 |
MIT | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1320 | 154 | 13 |
42 |
13 | 14.00 | 171.43 |
---|
8 |
Brown | 0–7 | 0.0% | 1355 | 159 | 18 |
37 |
15 | 14.36 | 170.44 |
---|
Pool B
# |
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
1 |
Florida A | 7–0 | 100.0% | 2370 | 159 | 27 |
62 |
15 | 15.96 | 298.11 |
---|
2 |
Illinois A | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1915 | 159 | 18 |
57 |
11 | 15.07 | 240.88 |
---|
3 |
Chicago B | 4–3 | 57.1% | 2235 | 161 | 16 |
67 |
17 | 16.99 | 277.64 |
---|
3 |
Harvard | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1675 | 158 | 14 |
60 |
17 | 12.84 | 212.03 |
---|
5 |
Maryland | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1545 | 158 | 12 |
50 |
13 | 15.00 | 195.57 |
---|
5 |
Northwestern | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1455 | 162 | 6 |
56 |
17 | 14.35 | 179.63 |
---|
5 |
Columbia A | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1365 | 157 | 9 |
51 |
14 | 13.17 | 173.89 |
---|
5 |
Columbia B | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1235 | 158 | 13 |
42 |
10 | 12.18 | 156.33 |
---|
Pool D
# |
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
1 |
Cornell B | 7–0 | 100.0% | 1935 | 152 | 10 |
70 |
7 | 14.00 | 254.61 |
---|
2 |
Duke | 6–1 | 85.7% | 1820 | 152 | 8 |
67 |
14 | 14.67 | 239.47 |
---|
3 |
Kentucky | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1185 | 158 | 3 |
56 |
8 | 10.51 | 150.00 |
---|
4 |
WUSTL B | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1300 | 159 | 8 |
53 |
14 | 11.80 | 163.52 |
---|
4 |
Texas | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1230 | 151 | 8 |
51 |
16 | 11.53 | 162.91 |
---|
6 |
Toronto A | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1190 | 159 | 4 |
57 |
14 | 10.33 | 149.69 |
---|
6 |
Western Ontario | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1045 | 160 | 4 |
51 |
9 | 9.45 | 130.62 |
---|
8 |
Minnesota B | 0–7 | 0.0% | 685 | 155 | 1 |
39 |
6 | 7.75 | 88.39 |
---|
Division II Pool AA
The displayed ranks are the order of finish within each pool. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
Pool BB
# |
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
1 |
Yale | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2185 | 167 | 22 |
65 |
17 | 14.83 | 261.68 |
---|
2 |
UC Berkeley B | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2255 | 163 | 28 |
56 |
21 | 16.43 | 276.69 |
---|
3 |
WUSTL C | 4–3 | 57.1% | 2225 | 163 | 20 |
59 |
17 | 17.97 | 273.01 |
---|
3 |
Toronto B | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1705 | 161 | 18 |
50 |
17 | 15.00 | 211.80 |
---|
5 |
Illinois B | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1880 | 162 | 22 |
50 |
18 | 15.83 | 232.10 |
---|
5 |
Illinois C | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1775 | 158 | 21 |
45 |
14 | 16.36 | 224.68 |
---|
7 |
Ohio State B | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1820 | 162 | 19 |
50 |
25 | 16.81 | 224.69 |
---|
8 |
Truman State | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1745 | 162 | 10 |
56 |
5 | 16.06 | 215.43 |
---|
Pool CC
# |
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
1 |
Georgia Tech B | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2710 | 163 | 31 |
65 |
19 | 17.60 | 332.52 |
---|
2 |
North Carolina B | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2400 | 157 | 30 |
56 |
12 | 16.86 | 305.73 |
---|
2 |
UCLA | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1960 | 156 | 14 |
59 |
14 | 16.85 | 251.28 |
---|
4 |
USC | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1930 | 152 | 24 |
47 |
18 | 16.76 | 253.95 |
---|
4 |
Iowa State | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1860 | 160 | 19 |
49 |
11 | 16.76 | 232.50 |
---|
6 |
Williams | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1625 | 157 | 16 |
46 |
19 | 16.45 | 207.01 |
---|
7 |
Washington | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1770 | 154 | 15 |
49 |
21 | 18.12 | 229.87 |
---|
7 |
RIT | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1660 | 157 | 20 |
44 |
18 | 15.78 | 211.46 |
---|
Pool DD
# |
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
1 |
Purdue B | 7–0 | 100.0% | 2460 | 157 | 22 |
68 |
8 | 16.56 | 313.38 |
---|
2 |
Florida B | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2415 | 156 | 20 |
72 |
13 | 15.87 | 309.62 |
---|
3 |
Nebraska | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1800 | 129 | 7 |
61 |
9 | 16.62 | 279.07 |
---|
4 |
Michigan | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1370 | 162 | 8 |
51 |
12 | 13.56 | 169.14 |
---|
4 |
Chipola | 3–4 | 42.9% | 870 | 137 | 9 |
31 |
11 | 12.00 | 127.01 |
---|
6 |
Missouri | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1180 | 160 | 9 |
49 |
21 | 11.38 | 147.50 |
---|
7 |
Notre Dame | 1–6 | 14.3% | 605 | 92 | 2 |
27 |
5 | 11.38 | 131.52 |
---|
7 |
Tallahassee CC | 1–6 | 14.3% | 715 | 137 | 4 |
35 |
13 | 9.49 | 104.38 |
---|
Explanation of Statistics
Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.
Read