2024 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament
Date: |
Friday, April 5, 2024 – Saturday, April 6, 2024 |
Host: |
Hyatt Regency O'Hare Chicago (Rosemont, IL) |
Division I Pool A
The displayed ranks are the order of finish within each pool. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
# |
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
1 |
Chicago A | 7–0 | 100.0% | 3430 | 166 | 28 |
81 |
12 | 20.73 | 413.25 |
---|
2 |
WUSTL | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2435 | 162 | 24 |
65 |
21 | 17.19 | 300.62 |
---|
3 |
Stanford | 4–3 | 57.1% | 2125 | 164 | 20 |
56 |
23 | 18.16 | 259.15 |
---|
3 |
Toronto A | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1855 | 162 | 19 |
57 |
16 | 14.21 | 229.01 |
---|
5 |
Cornell A | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1850 | 157 | 20 |
51 |
22 | 16.20 | 235.67 |
---|
5 |
UC Berkeley A | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1660 | 161 | 9 |
54 |
17 | 16.98 | 206.21 |
---|
7 |
Georgia Tech | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1580 | 163 | 14 |
48 |
30 | 16.77 | 193.87 |
---|
8 |
Georgia State | 0–7 | 0.0% | 1185 | 159 | 9 |
43 |
8 | 12.69 | 149.06 |
---|
Pool B
# |
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
1 |
Columbia A | 6–1 | 85.7% | 1830 | 158 | 8 |
65 |
12 | 15.34 | 231.65 |
---|
2 |
Chicago B | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1780 | 158 | 10 |
62 |
12 | 14.86 | 225.32 |
---|
2 |
Northwestern | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1705 | 161 | 9 |
67 |
24 | 13.42 | 211.80 |
---|
4 |
Illinois A | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1520 | 155 | 10 |
57 |
16 | 13.13 | 196.13 |
---|
4 |
Texas | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1235 | 162 | 7 |
47 |
14 | 13.52 | 152.47 |
---|
6 |
Waterloo A | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1380 | 158 | 13 |
49 |
23 | 13.06 | 174.68 |
---|
6 |
Cornell B | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1255 | 160 | 6 |
55 |
13 | 11.15 | 156.88 |
---|
6 |
Brown | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1170 | 156 | 6 |
51 |
18 | 11.58 | 150.00 |
---|
Pool C
# |
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
1 |
UC Berkeley B | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1575 | 148 | 11 |
57 |
20 | 13.82 | 212.84 |
---|
2 |
Rutgers | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1675 | 150 | 7 |
66 |
10 | 13.15 | 223.33 |
---|
2 |
Minnesota A | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1585 | 144 | 12 |
52 |
17 | 15.16 | 220.14 |
---|
2 |
UCLA | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1405 | 152 | 9 |
53 |
10 | 12.74 | 184.87 |
---|
5 |
Indiana | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1665 | 149 | 13 |
56 |
16 | 14.35 | 223.49 |
---|
5 |
Iowa State | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1275 | 148 | 6 |
48 |
5 | 13.52 | 172.30 |
---|
5 |
Penn State | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1290 | 156 | 14 |
49 |
22 | 11.11 | 165.38 |
---|
8 |
Harvard | 2–5 | 28.6% | 815 | 149 | 5 |
39 |
12 | 9.32 | 109.40 |
---|
Pool D
# |
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
1 |
Michigan A | 6–1 | 85.7% | 1965 | 153 | 14 |
68 |
11 | 13.78 | 256.86 |
---|
1 |
Maryland A | 6–1 | 85.7% | 1385 | 156 | 3 |
59 |
6 | 12.58 | 177.56 |
---|
3 |
Ohio State | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1325 | 152 | 6 |
58 |
13 | 11.25 | 174.34 |
---|
4 |
Illinois B | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1170 | 148 | 12 |
47 |
12 | 9.83 | 158.11 |
---|
5 |
MIT | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1105 | 160 | 7 |
47 |
14 | 11.11 | 138.12 |
---|
6 |
Florida | 2–5 | 28.6% | 965 | 160 | 3 |
43 |
6 | 11.30 | 120.62 |
---|
7 |
Minnesota B | 1–6 | 14.3% | 835 | 158 | 3 |
43 |
14 | 9.35 | 105.70 |
---|
7 |
Chicago C | 1–6 | 14.3% | 800 | 153 | 4 |
39 |
26 | 11.16 | 104.58 |
---|
Division II Pool AA
The displayed ranks are the order of finish within each pool. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
# |
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
1 |
Waterloo B | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2990 | 165 | 41 |
54 |
11 | 19.89 | 362.42 |
---|
2 |
Columbia B | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2615 | 167 | 39 |
46 |
24 | 19.88 | 313.17 |
---|
2 |
Missouri | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2580 | 167 | 31 |
54 |
13 | 19.29 | 308.98 |
---|
4 |
NYU | 3–4 | 42.9% | 2400 | 164 | 28 |
53 |
14 | 18.77 | 292.68 |
---|
4 |
Chicago D | 3–4 | 42.9% | 2340 | 167 | 31 |
45 |
23 | 20.26 | 280.24 |
---|
4 |
Yale | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1855 | 168 | 25 |
41 |
16 | 17.42 | 220.83 |
---|
7 |
Chicago E | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1725 | 166 | 16 |
46 |
19 | 18.06 | 207.83 |
---|
8 |
Washington | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1920 | 166 | 24 |
49 |
14 | 15.62 | 231.33 |
---|
Pool CC
# |
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
1 |
Oklahoma | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2060 | 165 | 17 |
63 |
15 | 15.62 | 249.70 |
---|
2 |
UCF | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2380 | 166 | 23 |
62 |
9 | 17.18 | 286.75 |
---|
2 |
Michigan B | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1985 | 163 | 22 |
57 |
17 | 14.81 | 243.56 |
---|
2 |
SIU-Edwardsville | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1840 | 159 | 13 |
62 |
23 | 15.20 | 231.45 |
---|
5 |
McMaster | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1810 | 161 | 26 |
43 |
24 | 16.09 | 224.84 |
---|
6 |
Ottawa | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1185 | 162 | 8 |
52 |
35 | 12.00 | 146.30 |
---|
7 |
Chicago F | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1325 | 156 | 11 |
43 |
14 | 14.81 | 169.87 |
---|
7 |
Chipola | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1115 | 164 | 6 |
49 |
11 | 10.73 | 135.98 |
---|
Explanation of Statistics
Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.
Read