2008 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament
Date: |
Friday, April 11, 2008 – Saturday, April 12, 2008 |
Host: |
Washington University in St. Louis (St. Louis, MO) |
Division I Pool 1
Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Maryland | 13–0 | 100.0% | 4375 | 284 | 59 |
105 |
48 | 16.34 | 308.10 |
---|
Chicago | 12–1 | 92.3% | 4410 | 296 | 46 |
118 |
28 | 16.34 | 297.97 |
---|
Illinois A | 10–3 | 76.9% | 4170 | 308 | 43 |
114 |
32 | 16.21 | 270.78 |
---|
Brown | 9–4 | 69.2% | 3680 | 284 | 32 |
113 |
28 | 15.24 | 259.15 |
---|
UC Irvine | 9–4 | 69.2% | 3450 | 288 | 33 |
104 |
26 | 14.93 | 239.58 |
---|
Vanderbilt | 9–4 | 69.2% | 2860 | 302 | 23 |
101 |
32 | 13.43 | 189.40 |
---|
Stanford A | 7–6 | 53.8% | 3825 | 292 | 23 |
121 |
11 | 16.15 | 261.99 |
---|
Harvard | 6–7 | 46.2% | 2565 | 276 | 25 |
85 |
22 | 13.18 | 185.87 |
---|
Pool 2
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Iowa | 8–5 | 61.5% | 2880 | 275 | 21 |
104 |
24 | 13.16 | 209.45 |
---|
Florida | 8–5 | 61.5% | 2740 | 277 | 20 |
103 |
25 | 12.58 | 197.83 |
---|
Dartmouth | 8–5 | 61.5% | 2875 | 292 | 13 |
121 |
25 | 11.90 | 196.92 |
---|
Minnesota | 8–5 | 61.5% | 2470 | 266 | 11 |
106 |
19 | 11.65 | 185.71 |
---|
Williams | 7–6 | 53.8% | 3285 | 305 | 38 |
104 |
24 | 12.64 | 215.41 |
---|
Drake | 7–6 | 53.8% | 3065 | 302 | 11 |
124 |
19 | 13.00 | 202.98 |
---|
Carleton College | 6–7 | 46.2% | 2855 | 289 | 23 |
104 |
22 | 12.44 | 197.58 |
---|
VCU | 4–9 | 30.8% | 1605 | 279 | 6 |
84 |
36 | 9.50 | 115.05 |
---|
Pool 3
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Rutgers | 8–5 | 61.5% | 2485 | 279 | 6 |
115 |
3 | 10.41 | 178.14 |
---|
Georgia | 8–5 | 61.5% | 1920 | 260 | 19 |
84 |
26 | 8.98 | 147.69 |
---|
UT-Chattanooga | 7–6 | 53.8% | 2465 | 266 | 16 |
100 |
26 | 11.68 | 185.34 |
---|
Toronto | 6–7 | 46.2% | 2045 | 268 | 15 |
84 |
21 | 10.96 | 152.61 |
---|
WUSTL | 5–8 | 38.5% | 2345 | 279 | 17 |
96 |
43 | 11.90 | 168.10 |
---|
Princeton | 5–8 | 38.5% | 2230 | 275 | 22 |
89 |
27 | 10.32 | 162.18 |
---|
Florida State | 5–8 | 38.5% | 2215 | 284 | 9 |
99 |
37 | 11.81 | 155.99 |
---|
Virginia Tech | 3–10 | 23.1% | 1835 | 285 | 5 |
87 |
13 | 10.38 | 128.77 |
---|
Pool 4
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Stanford B | 6–7 | 46.2% | 2015 | 268 | 6 |
100 |
31 | 10.19 | 150.37 |
---|
Illinois B | 6–7 | 46.2% | 1715 | 254 | 7 |
85 |
13 | 8.97 | 135.04 |
---|
Harding | 5–8 | 38.5% | 1565 | 265 | 8 |
85 |
13 | 7.17 | 118.11 |
---|
U of Rochester | 4–9 | 30.8% | 1285 | 265 | 6 |
64 |
18 | 9.21 | 96.98 |
---|
UCLA | 3–10 | 23.1% | 1625 | 264 | 11 |
73 |
20 | 9.88 | 123.11 |
---|
Alabama | 3–10 | 23.1% | 1180 | 257 | 4 |
67 |
33 | 8.66 | 91.83 |
---|
Oklahoma | 3–10 | 23.1% | 1195 | 266 | 3 |
69 |
6 | 7.00 | 89.85 |
---|
Division II Pool 1/2
Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
Pool 3/4
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Carnegie Mellon | 11–2 | 84.6% | 3100 | 280 | 19 |
114 |
31 | 13.76 | 221.43 |
---|
Tulsa | 9–4 | 69.2% | 2125 | 296 | 8 |
99 |
15 | 10.19 | 143.58 |
---|
WUSTL | 8–5 | 61.5% | 2165 | 286 | 6 |
100 |
24 | 11.27 | 151.40 |
---|
Swarthmore | 7–6 | 53.8% | 2875 | 293 | 16 |
106 |
28 | 14.06 | 196.25 |
---|
Iowa | 7–6 | 53.8% | 2480 | 296 | 25 |
93 |
36 | 11.48 | 167.57 |
---|
Missouri S&T | 6–7 | 46.2% | 2350 | 270 | 8 |
98 |
8 | 12.17 | 174.07 |
---|
Carleton College B | 6–7 | 46.2% | 2495 | 288 | 12 |
96 |
14 | 13.19 | 173.26 |
---|
Grinnell | 6–7 | 46.2% | 2520 | 293 | 11 |
101 |
14 | 12.63 | 172.01 |
---|
Pool 5/6
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Toronto | 9–4 | 69.2% | 2815 | 269 | 14 |
105 |
30 | 14.33 | 209.29 |
---|
Harvard | 8–5 | 61.5% | 3035 | 279 | 19 |
111 |
23 | 13.50 | 217.56 |
---|
Stanford | 8–5 | 61.5% | 2450 | 275 | 22 |
93 |
31 | 11.70 | 178.18 |
---|
Florida | 7–6 | 53.8% | 2070 | 264 | 7 |
89 |
14 | 11.93 | 156.82 |
---|
Valencia | 4–9 | 30.8% | 1740 | 276 | 7 |
80 |
19 | 10.69 | 126.09 |
---|
Brandeis | 4–9 | 30.8% | 1255 | 297 | 7 |
67 |
11 | 7.23 | 84.51 |
---|
Chipola | 3–10 | 23.1% | 1395 | 254 | 9 |
57 |
12 | 11.36 | 109.84 |
---|
Gulf Coast CC | 3–10 | 23.1% | 1390 | 293 | 7 |
74 |
27 | 8.40 | 94.88 |
---|
Explanation of Statistics
Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.
Read