2011 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament
Date: |
Friday, April 8, 2011 – Saturday, April 9, 2011 |
Host: |
Hyatt Regency O'Hare Chicago (Rosemont, IL) |
Division I Pool 1
Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Harvard | 13–0 | 100.0% | 5660 | 294 | 68 |
124 |
22 | 18.28 | 385.03 |
---|
Minnesota | 12–1 | 92.3% | 5625 | 312 | 45 |
151 |
26 | 18.21 | 360.58 |
---|
Brown | 10–3 | 76.9% | 4750 | 300 | 50 |
122 |
36 | 17.21 | 316.67 |
---|
Chicago A | 9–4 | 69.2% | 4495 | 297 | 41 |
117 |
38 | 18.35 | 302.69 |
---|
VCU | 9–4 | 69.2% | 3810 | 294 | 19 |
127 |
29 | 16.44 | 259.18 |
---|
Illinois | 8–5 | 61.5% | 4385 | 303 | 40 |
126 |
39 | 16.39 | 289.44 |
---|
Yale | 7–6 | 53.8% | 3915 | 294 | 30 |
120 |
17 | 15.67 | 266.33 |
---|
Carleton College | 7–6 | 53.8% | 3170 | 291 | 34 |
96 |
34 | 14.38 | 217.87 |
---|
Pool 2
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Maryland | 11–2 | 84.6% | 3970 | 302 | 25 |
138 |
25 | 14.36 | 262.91 |
---|
Michigan A | 9–4 | 69.2% | 3930 | 303 | 34 |
120 |
32 | 15.45 | 259.41 |
---|
UC Irvine | 8–5 | 61.5% | 3655 | 298 | 20 |
130 |
21 | 14.40 | 245.30 |
---|
Rice | 7–6 | 53.8% | 3410 | 298 | 17 |
121 |
17 | 14.71 | 228.86 |
---|
RPI | 7–6 | 53.8% | 2980 | 306 | 15 |
115 |
31 | 13.54 | 194.77 |
---|
Alabama | 6–7 | 46.2% | 2700 | 312 | 14 |
100 |
24 | 14.12 | 173.08 |
---|
Virginia | 5–8 | 38.5% | 3200 | 309 | 27 |
114 |
13 | 12.20 | 207.12 |
---|
Michigan B | 5–8 | 38.5% | 2095 | 307 | 12 |
92 |
23 | 10.88 | 136.48 |
---|
Pool 3
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Columbia | 8–5 | 61.5% | 2910 | 296 | 20 |
106 |
30 | 13.49 | 196.62 |
---|
Toronto | 8–5 | 61.5% | 2420 | 306 | 20 |
93 |
36 | 12.12 | 158.17 |
---|
Chicago B | 7–6 | 53.8% | 2860 | 281 | 19 |
104 |
19 | 13.25 | 203.56 |
---|
Oxford | 6–7 | 46.2% | 2635 | 285 | 21 |
95 |
16 | 12.50 | 184.91 |
---|
Lawrence | 6–7 | 46.2% | 2510 | 289 | 15 |
108 |
25 | 10.81 | 173.70 |
---|
Stanford | 4–9 | 30.8% | 2350 | 279 | 8 |
103 |
30 | 12.27 | 168.46 |
---|
WUSTL | 4–9 | 30.8% | 2315 | 300 | 13 |
103 |
26 | 10.52 | 154.33 |
---|
Ottawa | 2–11 | 15.4% | 1700 | 300 | 13 |
72 |
15 | 10.12 | 113.33 |
---|
Division II Pool 1/2
Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Yale | 13–0 | 100.0% | 7185 | 310 | 77 |
137 |
18 | 22.20 | 463.55 |
---|
Chicago A | 10–3 | 76.9% | 5620 | 308 | 75 |
100 |
33 | 20.91 | 364.94 |
---|
MIT | 10–3 | 76.9% | 4945 | 305 | 63 |
108 |
24 | 17.78 | 324.26 |
---|
Ohio State A | 10–3 | 76.9% | 4830 | 307 | 48 |
113 |
32 | 19.50 | 314.66 |
---|
VCU | 10–3 | 76.9% | 4495 | 309 | 54 |
108 |
26 | 16.88 | 290.94 |
---|
WUSTL | 8–5 | 61.5% | 4085 | 305 | 44 |
108 |
34 | 16.55 | 267.87 |
---|
Minnesota | 7–6 | 53.8% | 3740 | 302 | 35 |
102 |
22 | 16.82 | 247.68 |
---|
Princeton | 5–8 | 38.5% | 3640 | 303 | 36 |
94 |
34 | 17.92 | 240.26 |
---|
Explanation of Statistics
Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.
Read