2017 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament
Date: |
Friday, April 7, 2017 – Saturday, April 8, 2017 |
Host: |
Hyatt Regency O'Hare Chicago (Rosemont, IL) |
Division I Pool 1
Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Michigan A | 12–1 | 92.3% | 6165 | 291 | 77 |
118 |
24 | 20.26 | 423.71 |
---|
Northwestern | 12–1 | 92.3% | 4635 | 298 | 33 |
135 |
38 | 17.95 | 311.07 |
---|
Stanford A | 11–2 | 84.6% | 5045 | 304 | 46 |
130 |
31 | 18.24 | 331.91 |
---|
Maryland A | 10–3 | 76.9% | 5165 | 294 | 70 |
99 |
33 | 19.47 | 351.36 |
---|
Chicago A | 9–4 | 69.2% | 5570 | 297 | 54 |
129 |
24 | 19.73 | 375.08 |
---|
Yale A | 9–4 | 69.2% | 4715 | 304 | 47 |
115 |
32 | 18.64 | 310.20 |
---|
UC Berkeley A | 7–6 | 53.8% | 3785 | 292 | 39 |
99 |
44 | 17.61 | 259.25 |
---|
McGill | 6–7 | 46.2% | 2885 | 288 | 20 |
100 |
21 | 14.08 | 200.35 |
---|
Pool 2
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Columbia | 10–3 | 76.9% | 4225 | 281 | 32 |
118 |
27 | 18.00 | 300.71 |
---|
Minnesota A | 9–4 | 69.2% | 4055 | 279 | 36 |
106 |
21 | 18.03 | 290.68 |
---|
Toronto | 7–6 | 53.8% | 3270 | 288 | 28 |
108 |
44 | 14.63 | 227.08 |
---|
WUSTL A | 7–6 | 53.8% | 3105 | 286 | 11 |
116 |
18 | 14.72 | 217.13 |
---|
Missouri | 7–6 | 53.8% | 2980 | 285 | 23 |
102 |
23 | 13.84 | 209.12 |
---|
Chicago B | 6–7 | 46.2% | 3545 | 290 | 27 |
113 |
24 | 15.21 | 244.48 |
---|
Virginia | 6–7 | 46.2% | 3170 | 282 | 27 |
102 |
23 | 14.42 | 224.82 |
---|
Oklahoma | 4–9 | 30.8% | 2555 | 283 | 16 |
93 |
25 | 13.85 | 180.57 |
---|
Pool 3
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Florida | 9–4 | 69.2% | 2715 | 277 | 13 |
104 |
16 | 13.33 | 196.03 |
---|
UC Berkeley B | 8–5 | 61.5% | 3460 | 281 | 19 |
119 |
15 | 14.93 | 246.26 |
---|
MIT | 6–7 | 46.2% | 2795 | 283 | 15 |
98 |
16 | 14.78 | 197.53 |
---|
NYU A | 6–7 | 46.2% | 2655 | 290 | 17 |
96 |
42 | 14.86 | 183.10 |
---|
Michigan B | 6–7 | 46.2% | 2430 | 271 | 16 |
91 |
28 | 13.27 | 179.34 |
---|
Kenyon | 5–8 | 38.5% | 2200 | 281 | 11 |
89 |
9 | 11.90 | 156.58 |
---|
Amherst | 3–10 | 23.1% | 2345 | 280 | 11 |
96 |
28 | 12.71 | 167.50 |
---|
UC San Diego A | 2–11 | 15.4% | 1885 | 275 | 11 |
78 |
22 | 11.80 | 137.09 |
---|
Division II Pool 1/2
Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Illinois | 12–1 | 92.3% | 5475 | 282 | 69 |
111 |
42 | 19.67 | 388.30 |
---|
UC Berkeley C | 11–2 | 84.6% | 4995 | 285 | 46 |
116 |
39 | 20.62 | 350.53 |
---|
Delaware | 10–3 | 76.9% | 5090 | 292 | 48 |
123 |
28 | 19.18 | 348.63 |
---|
Ohio State | 10–3 | 76.9% | 4480 | 291 | 36 |
124 |
40 | 18.12 | 307.90 |
---|
Kentucky | 8–5 | 61.5% | 3965 | 289 | 34 |
107 |
31 | 18.01 | 274.39 |
---|
Georgetown | 8–5 | 61.5% | 3345 | 285 | 34 |
92 |
34 | 16.81 | 234.74 |
---|
Chicago C | 7–6 | 53.8% | 3155 | 277 | 18 |
102 |
27 | 16.81 | 227.80 |
---|
Rutgers | 6–7 | 46.2% | 3145 | 283 | 37 |
84 |
30 | 15.70 | 222.26 |
---|
Pool 3/4
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Harvard | 10–3 | 76.9% | 4580 | 266 | 43 |
113 |
23 | 18.72 | 344.36 |
---|
Stanford B | 10–3 | 76.9% | 3890 | 268 | 28 |
112 |
16 | 17.36 | 290.30 |
---|
Vanderbilt | 8–5 | 61.5% | 3860 | 278 | 34 |
103 |
20 | 17.66 | 277.70 |
---|
Maryland C | 8–5 | 61.5% | 3730 | 274 | 40 |
96 |
34 | 17.21 | 272.26 |
---|
New College | 8–5 | 61.5% | 3445 | 274 | 31 |
99 |
21 | 16.12 | 251.46 |
---|
WUSTL B | 6–7 | 46.2% | 3265 | 273 | 23 |
105 |
24 | 15.55 | 239.19 |
---|
Michigan C | 6–7 | 46.2% | 3155 | 278 | 36 |
84 |
51 | 16.92 | 226.98 |
---|
Cornell | 5–8 | 38.5% | 2220 | 269 | 10 |
92 |
26 | 12.55 | 165.06 |
---|
Explanation of Statistics
Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.
Read