ÎÞÓǶÌÊÓƵ

Boston University Juniorbird

Date: Saturday, September 23, 2006
Host: Boston University (Boston, MA)
Scoring Rules: ÎÞÓǶÌÊÓƵ
Questions: IS-60

Players are ranked by their PP20TUH (points per 20 tossups heard) in the preliminary rounds of the tournament. Ties are broken by their power percentage (P%).

Highlighted players played under aliases and may be ineligible for consideration for awards and records.
# Player Team GP TUH P TU I P% PP20TUH
1 Ryan PeeksAmherst A 13 234 36 49 7 42.4% 85.04
2 Kyle Haddad-FondaHarvard A 11 198 35 20 10 63.6% 68.18
3 Dennis SunHarvard B 13 234 32 38 14 45.7% 67.52
4 Jesse JacksonMIT A 13 234 24 31 6 43.6% 54.70
4 Jeff NanneyHarvard C 13 234 24 39 22 38.1% 54.70
6 Matthew LeskoBoston College B 13 234 21 36 8 36.8% 54.27
7 SamAmherst B 13 234 18 42 13 30.0% 53.42
8 Sam LedererHarvard A 11 198 17 25 5 40.5% 48.48
9 Yi SunHarvard C 13 234 23 27 11 46.0% 47.86
10 Samuel L. JacksonMIT A 4 72 4 11 1 26.7% 45.83
11 BobBoston U 13 234 13 38 16 25.5% 42.31
12 Kevin NewmanBoston College B 12 216 14 30 12 31.8% 41.67
13 Hannah KirschBrandeis 13 234 9 39 9 18.8% 41.03
14 Adam HallowellHarvard A 10 180 13 17 4 43.3% 38.33
15 John LesieutreHarvard A 10 180 14 14 2 50.0% 37.78
16 Peter JacksonMIT A 12 216 12 24 5 33.3% 36.57
17 DeathOlin College A 13 234 12 26 7 31.6% 34.62
18 Ana EnriquezHarvard B 13 216 18 14 14 56.2% 31.48
19 MulanMIT B 10 180 4 24 4 14.3% 31.11
20 Julia SchlozmanHarvard A 10 180 15 7 4 68.2% 30.56
21 JamesAmherst B 13 234 12 19 4 38.7% 29.91
22 Chris DeMatteoBoston College C 13 234 7 27 8 20.6% 28.63
23 Jackson PollockMIT A 13 225 13 18 16 41.9% 26.22
24 Snow WhiteMIT B 11 198 4 20 2 16.7% 25.25
25 FamineOlin College A 13 234 6 24 9 20.0% 24.36
26 Matthew SweetBoston College A 13 234 4 24 4 14.3% 23.93
26 Matthew PerryBoston College A 13 234 2 32 14 5.9% 23.93
28 Ruvani FonsekaHarvard B 13 216 9 15 8 37.5% 22.69
29 VictoriaAmherst A 13 234 13 8 4 61.9% 21.79
30 JuliusBoston College C 13 234 7 17 5 29.2% 21.37
31 ChaucerOlin College B 13 234 10 11 8 47.6% 18.80
32 Nathan SeifertAmherst A 13 234 2 20 3 9.1% 18.38
33 AmyAmherst B 13 234 3 16 1 15.8% 17.09
34 Kyle BeanHarvard C 13 234 5 12 0 29.4% 16.67
35 Danielle NahmiasBoston U 13 234 5 18 13 21.7% 16.24
36 PocahontasMIT B 10 180 2 12 3 14.3% 15.00
37 Alice TzengHarvard C 13 234 4 12 1 25.0% 14.96
37 WarOlin College A 13 234 3 14 2 17.6% 14.96
39 AndrewBrandeis 13 234 3 14 3 17.6% 14.53
40 Andrew JacksonMIT A 11 189 6 5 1 54.5% 14.29
41 Rosie the RiveterBoston U 13 234 4 13 5 23.5% 14.10
42 PestilenceOlin College A 13 234 4 10 1 28.6% 13.25
43 Loren Lee ChenBrandeis 13 234 5 10 5 33.3% 12.82
44 LeslieOlin College B 13 234 3 10 3 23.1% 11.11
45 Eric the RedOlin College B 13 234 4 9 6 30.8% 10.26
46 JasmineMIT B 10 180 1 9 3 10.0% 10.00
47 Matthew LeskoBoston College A 9 162 2 7 4 22.2% 9.88
48 Ben FranklinOlin College B 13 234 4 9 9 30.8% 8.97
49 Huy NguyenHarvard B 6 99 0 4 0 0.0% 8.08
50 KayvonBoston U 13 234 4 4 2 50.0% 7.69
51 SaraAmherst A 13 234 2 4 1 33.3% 5.56
52 BelleMIT B 11 198 1 3 0 25.0% 4.55
53 Tom ChambersBoston College B 13 234 1 2 2 33.3% 2.14
54 AntonBoston College C 13 234 0 3 3 0.0% 1.28
55 Antonio IglesiasHarvard B 10 171 0 0 1 0.0% -0.58

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read