2005 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament
Date: |
Friday, April 8, 2005 – Saturday, April 9, 2005 |
Host: |
Tulane University (New Orleans, LA) |
Division I Pool 1
Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Michigan A | 13–0 | 100.0% | 5775 | 312 | 46 |
150 |
34 | 19.16 | 370.19 |
---|
Chicago A | 12–1 | 92.3% | 5820 | 324 | 52 |
145 |
37 | 19.16 | 359.26 |
---|
U of Rochester | 10–3 | 76.9% | 3575 | 298 | 19 |
124 |
30 | 15.38 | 239.93 |
---|
Illinois A | 9–4 | 69.2% | 4365 | 310 | 46 |
117 |
34 | 16.41 | 281.61 |
---|
Stanford | 9–4 | 69.2% | 3325 | 305 | 11 |
129 |
18 | 14.00 | 218.03 |
---|
UC Berkeley | 8–5 | 61.5% | 4165 | 313 | 31 |
135 |
36 | 15.24 | 266.13 |
---|
Florida | 6–7 | 46.2% | 2915 | 309 | 21 |
101 |
29 | 14.22 | 188.67 |
---|
Yale | 6–7 | 46.2% | 2630 | 314 | 11 |
106 |
24 | 13.03 | 167.52 |
---|
Pool 2
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
VCU | 9–4 | 69.2% | 3470 | 311 | 18 |
131 |
15 | 13.19 | 223.15 |
---|
Princeton | 9–4 | 69.2% | 3085 | 299 | 14 |
121 |
35 | 13.63 | 206.35 |
---|
Carleton College | 8–5 | 61.5% | 2990 | 302 | 6 |
119 |
6 | 13.92 | 198.01 |
---|
Emory | 8–5 | 61.5% | 2820 | 292 | 11 |
115 |
17 | 12.82 | 193.15 |
---|
Harvard | 8–5 | 61.5% | 2935 | 307 | 10 |
130 |
44 | 12.18 | 191.21 |
---|
South Florida A | 7–6 | 53.8% | 3135 | 298 | 17 |
112 |
17 | 14.30 | 210.40 |
---|
Michigan B | 7–6 | 53.8% | 2420 | 299 | 16 |
97 |
36 | 12.30 | 161.87 |
---|
Vanderbilt | 4–9 | 30.8% | 2270 | 294 | 7 |
102 |
29 | 11.83 | 154.42 |
---|
Pool 3
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Rutgers | 9–4 | 69.2% | 2800 | 297 | 9 |
121 |
5 | 11.38 | 188.55 |
---|
UCLA | 7–6 | 53.8% | 3005 | 301 | 12 |
112 |
27 | 14.84 | 199.67 |
---|
British Columbia | 6–7 | 46.2% | 2435 | 307 | 11 |
99 |
22 | 12.64 | 158.63 |
---|
Williams | 6–7 | 46.2% | 2300 | 296 | 14 |
105 |
28 | 9.92 | 155.41 |
---|
Virginia | 5–8 | 38.5% | 1780 | 308 | 3 |
92 |
30 | 10.16 | 115.58 |
---|
Columbia | 4–9 | 30.8% | 2285 | 306 | 12 |
91 |
24 | 12.77 | 149.35 |
---|
Maryland | 4–9 | 30.8% | 1890 | 291 | 4 |
90 |
25 | 11.22 | 129.90 |
---|
Louisiana State | 4–9 | 30.8% | 1465 | 313 | 10 |
75 |
30 | 8.41 | 93.61 |
---|
Pool 4
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Illinois B | 7–6 | 53.8% | 2270 | 308 | 11 |
97 |
13 | 11.11 | 147.40 |
---|
Brandeis | 6–7 | 46.2% | 1970 | 317 | 9 |
93 |
24 | 10.05 | 124.29 |
---|
Minnesota | 5–8 | 38.5% | 1765 | 316 | 12 |
80 |
34 | 10.38 | 111.71 |
---|
South Florida B | 4–9 | 30.8% | 1680 | 317 | 8 |
88 |
31 | 8.70 | 105.99 |
---|
Chicago B | 4–9 | 30.8% | 1500 | 307 | 2 |
85 |
17 | 8.10 | 97.72 |
---|
Swarthmore | 3–10 | 23.1% | 1960 | 298 | 8 |
88 |
20 | 11.04 | 131.54 |
---|
Rice | 1–12 | 7.7% | 1315 | 310 | 2 |
77 |
28 | 8.29 | 84.84 |
---|
Valencia | 0–13 | 0.0% | 605 | 309 | 5 |
42 |
23 | 4.79 | 39.16 |
---|
Explanation of Statistics
Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.
Read