��Ƕ��Ƶ

2019 ASCA High School District @ Athens

Date:	Friday, February 8, 2019
Host:	Athens State University (Athens, AL)
Sponsor:	Alabama Scholastic Competition Association (Horton, AL)
Scoring Rules:	Straight Tossup/Bounceback Bonus

Division I Pool A: IS-182A (packets 4–10)

The highlighted teams marked with ‘A’ qualified for the 2019 High School National Championship Tournament.
The highlighted team marked with ‘B’ qualified for the 2019 Small School National Championship Tournament (Open Division).
#	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	TU	PPB	BB%	PP20TUH
1^A	Sparkman	5–1	83.3%	2000	120	60	20.17	33.9%	333.33
2^A^B	Randolph	5–1	83.3%	2620	121	71	23.52	40.7%	433.06
3	Covenant Christian	4–2	66.7%	2290	121	70	20.14	36.0%	378.51
3	Huntsville	4–2	66.7%	1990	120	64	19.38	28.9%	331.67
5	Hazel Green	2–4	33.3%	1350	121	41	16.83	28.4%	223.14
6	Athens	1–5	16.7%	1260	120	44	15.91	16.7%	210.00
7	New Century	0–6	0.0%	1340	121	50	13.80	19.7%	221.49

Division I Pool B: IS-182A (packets 4–10)

The highlighted teams marked with ‘C’ qualified for the 2019 High School National Championship Tournament.
The highlighted team marked with ‘D’ qualified for the 2019 Small School National Championship Tournament (Open Division).
The highlighted team marked with ‘E’ qualified for the 2019 Small School National Championship Tournament (Traditional Public Schools Division).
#	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	TU	PPB	BB%	PP20TUH
1^C	Grissom	6–0	100.0%	2830	120	81	21.23	68.2%	471.67
2^C	Buckhorn	5–1	83.3%	2040	120	67	18.06	33.3%	340.00
3	East Limestone	3–3	50.0%	1450	120	48	16.25	22.6%	241.67
4	James Clemens	2–4	33.3%	1810	120	57	18.42	28.4%	301.67
4	Bob Jones	2–4	33.3%	1670	120	48	18.75	38.7%	278.33
4^D	Whitesburg Christian	2–4	33.3%	1530	120	51	15.88	31.3%	255.00
7^E	Ardmore	1–5	16.7%	1240	120	41	15.85	22.0%	206.67

Division II: IS-182A (packets 4–10)

The highlighted teams marked with ‘F’ qualified for the 2019 Small School National Championship Tournament (Traditional Public Schools Division).
The highlighted team marked with ‘G’ qualified for the 2019 High School National Championship Tournament.
#	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	TU	PPB	BB%	PP20TUH
1^F^G	Elkmont	3–0	100.0%	1160	60	37	18.11	48.0%	386.67
2^F	West Limestone	2–1	66.7%	790	60	31	13.87	23.8%	263.33
3	Priceville	1–2	33.3%	660	60	26	12.69	20.6%	220.00
4	Tanner	0–3	0.0%	190	60	5	14.00	10.4%	63.33

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.