��Ƕ��Ƶ

Tournaments
2003 ICT
Current: Standings

2003 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament

Date:	Friday, April 4, 2003 – Saturday, April 5, 2003
Host:	University of California-Los Angeles (Los Angeles, CA)

Division I

Jump to Division II

#	UG	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
1		Chicago	16–0	100.0%	8655	392	89	152	44	22.47	410.71
2		UC Berkeley A	12–3	80.0%	6455	376	54	147	41	20.67	331.38
3		Maryland	11–4	73.3%	4315	376	24	147	24	15.23	229.52
4		Michigan A	11–3	78.6%	6165	363	60	142	35	19.90	339.67
5		Yale A	11–4	73.3%	5285	382	37	157	46	17.47	276.70
6		Michigan B	10–5	66.7%	4705	378	24	160	31	15.76	248.94
7	1	Harvard	11–5	68.8%	4350	371	23	133	48	16.54	216.44
8		UC Berkeley C	8–7	53.3%	3650	372	26	114	42	16.64	196.24
9		Stanford A	8–7	53.3%	4295	356	25	135	34	17.12	241.29
10		Cornell	8–7	53.3%	3730	361	22	119	14	16.17	206.65
11		Florida	8–7	53.3%	5300	388	53	138	44	17.51	273.20
12	2	UC Berkeley B	9–7	56.2%	3580	373	29	117	47	13.90	182.31
13	3	Michigan C	9–6	60.0%	3215	355	15	135	38	12.20	181.13
14	4	Case Western	8–7	53.3%	3630	359	14	135	33	15.00	202.23
15		Emory	8–7	53.3%	3505	377	12	146	28	12.69	185.94
16		Delaware	9–6	60.0%	2615	354	9	121	50	11.69	147.74
17		UCLA	7–8	46.7%	3085	363	21	119	26	12.21	169.97
18	5	Princeton	8–7	53.3%	3805	369	15	140	35	15.19	206.23
19	6	Northwestern	8–7	53.3%	2985	383	14	122	30	12.54	155.87
20		Texas A&M	5–10	33.3%	3455	370	12	134	36	14.49	186.76
21		Virginia	7–8	46.7%	3055	373	23	114	66	13.87	163.81
22	7	Stanford B	6–9	40.0%	2435	374	8	108	39	12.33	130.21
23	8	Carleton College	5–10	33.3%	2670	366	11	107	29	13.39	145.90
24	9	Caltech	5–10	33.3%	2260	348	11	104	36	10.74	129.89
25		Yale B	4–11	26.7%	2185	353	12	91	28	11.99	123.80
26	10	Williams	5–10	33.3%	2265	367	17	99	30	10.09	123.43
27		Wisconsin	6–9	40.0%	2155	354	11	110	37	8.88	121.75
28	11	Missouri	5–10	33.3%	1935	370	9	95	15	8.89	104.59
29		South Florida	5–10	33.3%	2260	359	9	107	15	9.74	125.91
30	12	DePauw	4–11	26.7%	1920	362	11	90	32	10.05	106.08
31	13	Simon Fraser	2–13	13.3%	1505	381	9	77	17	7.97	79.00
32		Goodenough	2–13	13.3%	1930	353	11	92	25	9.42	109.35

Division II

Jump to Division I

#	CC	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
1		UC Berkeley	12–2	85.7%	3905	286	13	118	30	17.79	248.60
2	1	Valencia A	10–4	71.4%	3220	294	13	116	43	14.19	202.04
3		Michigan	11–2	84.6%	3960	281	13	141	19	15.91	281.85
4		Stanford	9–4	69.2%	2575	293	7	113	20	12.00	175.77
5		UCLA	9–4	69.2%	3140	289	14	114	29	15.12	217.30
6		Chicago	9–4	69.2%	2955	291	12	123	22	12.26	203.09
7		Caltech	6–7	46.2%	2455	283	5	101	28	14.25	173.50
8		Brandeis	7–6	53.8%	2120	303	12	99	23	9.59	139.93
9		Carleton College	8–5	61.5%	2970	296	13	115	17	13.36	200.68
10		MIT	8–5	61.5%	2540	288	14	105	28	11.93	176.39
11		Swarthmore	8–5	61.5%	2290	293	3	108	16	11.22	156.31
12		Truman State	8–5	61.5%	2375	292	16	103	38	10.88	162.67
13		North Carolina	8–5	61.5%	2860	301	10	115	34	13.84	190.03
14		Virginia	7–6	53.8%	2540	280	11	112	22	11.10	181.43
15		Maryland	6–7	46.2%	1945	290	3	88	16	12.09	134.14
16		Princeton	5–8	38.5%	2215	295	4	92	32	14.53	150.17
17		Iowa State	10–3	76.9%	2305	283	6	104	26	11.86	162.90
18		Florida	9–4	69.2%	2440	279	4	112	20	11.72	174.91
19		Columbia	7–6	53.8%	1840	282	4	93	36	10.62	130.50
20	2	Bainbridge State	5–8	38.5%	1955	303	2	104	29	9.72	129.04
21		British Columbia	7–6	53.8%	2105	288	5	100	20	10.76	146.18
22	3	Bevill-Jasper	5–8	38.5%	1500	296	4	77	12	9.01	101.35
23		Northwestern	3–10	23.1%	1925	290	4	95	19	10.20	132.76
24	4	Abraham Baldwin	3–10	23.1%	1320	305	4	60	17	11.64	86.56
25		Rice	7–6	53.8%	2640	305	9	115	34	12.30	173.11
26		WUSTL	7–6	53.8%	2535	291	7	108	24	12.78	174.23
27	5	Valencia B	4–9	30.8%	1360	303	1	86	29	7.24	89.77
28	6	MS Gulf Coast CC-Jefferson Davis	4–9	30.8%	1205	300	1	72	18	7.67	80.33
29	7	Northwest-Shoals CC	3–10	23.1%	1185	315	2	67	16	8.19	75.24
30		USC	3–10	23.1%	1255	290	4	75	40	8.16	86.55
31		UC Riverside	1–12	7.7%	390	304	0	32	5	2.97	25.66
32	8	Cloud County CC	0–13	0.0%	565	305	2	44	15	3.70	37.05

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read

���Ƕ���Ƶ

2003 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament

Division I

Division II

Explanation of Statistics